SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 110

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA
J. Magdalene Rejula – Appellant
Versus
K. Ramesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: M. Murali Dharan,

JUDGMENT :

Prayer: Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 307 & 401 of the Code of Cr.P.C to call for the records and set aside the orders dated 20.11.2021 passed in Crl.M.P.No.1619 of 2021 in C.C.No.1738 of 2017 by the learned XX Metropolitan Magistrate, Allikulam, Chennai 600 003.

1. This Criminal revision has been filed against the order passed by the learned XX Metropolitan Magistrate, Allikulam, Chennai 600 003 made in Crl.M.P.No.1619 of 2021 in C.C.No.1738 of 2017 dated 20.11.2021, allowing the amendment application filed by the respondent/complainant,

2. The brief facts of the case is that the respondent/complainant has filed C.C.No.1738 of 2017 against the petitioner/accused for the offence under Section 138 of N.I Act in respect of dishonour of cheque bearing No.024337 dated 12.09.2016 for a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- drawn on Tamilnadu Mercantile Bank Limited, towards repayment of the loan. When the said cheque was returned by the Manager of the Tamilnadu Mercantile Bank Limited, he had issued a memorandum dated 17.09.2016 which was marked as Ex.P2 wherein the cheque number was mentioned as 024337. Based on the memorandum dated 17.09.2016, the respondent/complainant has mentio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top