SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 20

ABDUL QUDDHOSE
A. Anandhan – Appellant
Versus
S. Hari Kumar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:M. Hemasree, Advocate.
For the Respondents: T. Ramkumar, Advcoate.

JUDGMENT

Prayer: Petitions filed under Section 11 (6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking to appoint Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the differences and disputes between the petitioner and the respondent.

1. All these petitions have been filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking for appointment of an Arbitrator.

2. The respective respondents have entered into separate agreement of sale with the petitioner, under which, the respective respondents have agreed to buy a plot from the petitioner, who is the absolute owner. According to the petitioner, the respective respondents have committed default in the payment of balance sale consideration. The respective respondents have also jointly signed letters of consent dated 01.07.2021, 14.06.2021, 01.10.2021, 01.07.2021, 14.06.2021, 05.07.2021, 16.05.2021, 14.06.2021 and 12.06.2021, agreeing to refer the dispute, if any, arising out of agreement of sale to arbitration.

3. The petitioner has issued separate legal notices dated 04.06.2021, 04.06.2021, 05.05.2021, 05.05.2021, 04.06.2021, 04.

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top