C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
Muthulakshmi – Appellant
Versus
Thenammal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Prayer: Petition filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone the delay of 320 days in filing the Review Petition against judgment and decree in S.A.No.2055 of 2002, dated 25.10.2018 passed by this Court.
Review Application filed under Section 47 Rule 1 CPC to set aside the judgment, dated 25.10.2018 made in S.A.No.2055 of 2002 on the file of this Court.
1. Petition filed under section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, by the 2nd respondent in S.A. No. 2055 of 2002 to condone the delay of 320 days in filing Review Petition against the judgment and decree dated 25.10.2018 in S.A. No. 2055 of 2002.
2. In the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the petitioner, Muthulakshmi claimed that a copy of the judgment and decree dated 25.10.2018 in S.A. No. 2055 of 2002 was furnished by her advocate only in the month of February 2020. She further stated that owing to the Covid 19 pandemic situation, she was not able to file the Review Petition. She further stated that taking advantage of the judgment, the respondents are taking steps to alienate the suit schedule property. She claimed that she has a prima facie case. She therefore sought condonation of the delay of 320 day
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.