SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

K.CHANDRU
DEENADAYALAN S. – Appellant
Versus
CHAIRMAN, PORT TRUST – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For The Appellant : K. Raja
For The Respondent: M.R. Dharani Chander

ORDER :

K. Chandru, J.—The present writ petition is filed by the three employees of the Chennai Port Trust challenging the action of the Port Trust in preparing a new roster by which certain persons who are employed as Junior Assistants arc now brought to deal with time keeping Section and also D.Cs Buoy Yard Office. Those persons who are now given postings in the said Section have all been cited as respondents 3 to 6 in this writ petition.

2. I have heard the arguments of Mr. K. Raja, the learned Counsel for the petitioners and Mr. M.R. Dharani Chander, the learned Counsel appearing for the Port Trust. The argument of the learned Counsel for the petitioners was that the persons who are holding higher office are now brought to do the work of the time keeping Section and this cannot be allowed because, if it is allowed, the petitioners would be deprived of getting their fixed overtime allowance. Apart from this, they are also not getting promoted to the post of Junior Assistant, which requires eight years in the present post. The question of promotion to the post of Junior Assistant is not an issue before this Court. However, on the question of getting a share in the fixed overtime al

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top