M.S.RAMESH
M. Pandiyan – Appellant
Versus
Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Chennai – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the concerned records from the first respondent, quash the award dated 31.03.2015 passed by the first respondent in I.D.No.63 of 2014 insofar as denying 75% of the back wages and consequently direct the respondent No.2 to 4 to give denied 75% of the wages to the petitioner along with interest at the rate of 18% per annum, award cost.
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the second respondent in I.D.No.63 of 2014 dated 31.03.2015 and to quash the same insofar as the petitioners are concerned.)
1. The workman herein, who was employed as a Branch Post Master at Marudhavallipalayam Branch Post Office, Vellore Postal Division, was served with a charge-memo dated 19.03.2003 by the Superintendent of Post Offices (Management), alleging that he had failed to record the deposits collected from the savings bank account of two depositors, namely, Smt. Thangammal and Smt. Rajammal. On enquiry, both the charges were held as not proved.
1.2. However, the M
Hindustan Tin Works (P) Ltd. v. Employees
J.K. Synthetics Ltd. v. K.P. Agrawal [(2007) 2 SCC 433 : (2007) 1 SCC (L&S) 651]
Raj Kumar Dixit Vs. Vijay Kumar Gauri Shanker
Surendra Kumar Verma v. Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court
Syed Yakoob V. K.S.Radhakrishnan and Others reported in AIR 1964 SC 477
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.