Balamurugan vs State through, Inspector of Police, Tirunelveli

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(Mad) 314

R.SUBRAMANIAN, N.SATHISH KUMAR
Balamurugan – Appellant
Versus
State through, Inspector of Police, Tirunelveli – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants :R. Venkatesan, Advocate.
For the Respondent: S. Ravi, Additional Public Prosecutor.

JUDGMENT :

R. Subramanian, N. Sathish Kumar, JJ.

Prayer: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374(2) of Cr.P.C. against the judgment of conviction and sentence passed by the learned III Additional District and Sessions Judge Court, Tirunelveli made in S.C.No. 464 of 2015 dated 23.08.2018.

1. This appeal has been filed by the appellants/accused Nos.1 and 2 as against the conviction and sentence, dated 23.08.2018, made in S.C.No.464 of 2015, by the learned III Additional District and Sessions Judge (PCR), Madurai.

2. The appellants/A-1 and A-2 stood convicted and sentenced to undergo imprisonment as detailed hereunder:

	Conviction U/s.	Sentence	Fine amount
A-1	364 IPC	To undergo ten years rigorous imprisonment	To pay a fine of Rs.2,000/-, in default, to undergo one year rigorous imprisonment.
	302 IPC	To undergo life imprisonment	To pay a fine of Rs.5,000/-, in default, to undergo one rigorous imprisonment.
A-2	364 IPC	To undergo ten years rigorous imprisonment	To pay a fine of Rs.2,000/-,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2022 Supreme(Mad) 314

R.SUBRAMANIAN, N.SATHISH KUMARBalamurugan – AppellantVersusState through, Inspector of Police, Tirunelveli – Respondent

Cases Referred (2)

R.SUBRAMANIAN, N.SATHISH KUMAR
Balamurugan – Appellant
Versus
State through, Inspector of Police, Tirunelveli – Respondent