SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 333

R.THARANI
V. Abuthahir – Appellant
Versus
Thirupathi – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :S.M.A. Jinnah, Advocate.
For the Respondent:J. Gunaseelan Muthaiah, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

(Prayer: This criminal revision case filed under Section 397 r/w Section 401 of Cr.P.C., to call for the records from the lower Courts and set aside the judgment of the Appellate Court passed by the Additional District Judge No.VI, Madurai District, in C.A.No.17 of 2020, dated 29.10.2020, confirming the judgment of the Judicial Magistrate (Fast Track) No.II, Madurai District, in S.T.C. No.447 of 2016, dated 09.12.2019 by allowing the Revision.)

1. This Criminal Revision Case has been filed to set aside the judgment of the Appellate Court passed by the Additional District Judge No.VI, Madurai District, in C.A.No.17 of 2020, dated 29.10.2020, confirming the judgment of the Judicial Magistrate (Fast Track) No.II, Madurai District, in S.T.C. No. 447 of 2016, dated 09.12.2019.

2. The case against the revision petitioner is that on 01.06.2014, the petitioner borrowed a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- to meet out his family expenses and for business needs and agreed to pay an interest at the rate of 1.5% and executed an undertaking agreement. But, he failed to repay the amount, even after demand from the revision respondent. When the complainant approached the revision petitioner to repay t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top