SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 351

R.THARANI
M. Venkatesan – Appellant
Versus
D. Indra – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:S. Sankar, Advocate.
For the Respondent:M. Jeevanandam, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

(Prayer: This criminal revision case is filed under Sections 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C., to call for the entire records pertaining to the order and judgment rendered by the Family Judge, Madurai District, in M.C.No.29 of 2014 vide his judgment, dated 21.04.2016 by set aside the same.)

1. This revision has been filed to set aside the order passed by the Family Court, Madurai District, in M.C.No.29 of 2014, dated 21.04.2016. The revision petitioner herein is the husband and the respondent herein is the wife.

2. Brief substance of the petition, in M.C.No. 29 of 2014, is as follows :

The marriage between the petitioner and the respondent took place on 13.07.2005, at the Murugan Temple, Tirupparankundram. They lived peacefully for a period of three months. Subsequently, due to the instigation of the family members, the husband left the wife at her parents' house. Without the knowledge of the wife, the husband by giving a false address, obtained an exparte divorce order in H.M.O.P.No.156 of 2006. By getting the High Court order, the divorce petition was sent to the trial Court for fresh consideration. The petitioner filed a petition in H.M.O.P.No. 357 of 2007, for restitution of conju

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top