SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 352

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G. CHANDRASEKHARAN, J.
M.S. Raghavan – Appellant
Versus
The Inspector of Police, Bangalore & Another – Respondents
Crl. O.P. Nos. 880 & 2346 of 2022
Decided on : 18-02-2022

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :V. Gopinath, Senior Advocate for M/s. Vinithra Srinivasan, Advocate.
For the Respondent: K. Srinivasan, N. Ramesh, Adv

Headnote:

Criminal Procedure Code,1973 – Section 482 – Indian Penal Code,1860 - Sections 120-B r/w. 409, 420 - Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 13(2) r/w. 13(1) (d) – Criminal breach of trust - Seeking permission to travel to USA - Petitioner is shown as an accused on the file of Inspector of Police, Central Bureau of Investigation, Banking Security and Fraud Cell, for offences under Sections 120-B r/w. 409, 420 IPC and under Sections 13(2) r/w. 13(1) (d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Petitioner has never been arrested in this case nor has he applied for pre-arrest bail - He has been co-operating in investigation of first respondent - This petition is filed seeking permission to travel to USA for a period of six months to take care of his first daughter, who is due for delivery - Petitioner had earlier moved Crl.O.P. praying permission to travel to USA and return to India to attend marriage of petitioner's daughter scheduled - Due to Covid-19, wedding was postponed - Petitioner withdrew the petition informing said fact before Court - Once again, petitioner approached this Court to attend marriage - He filed Crl. O.P. and this Court permitted petitioner to travel abroad with certain conditions - Since, petitioner's daughter's marriage was shifted to Chennai and conducted in Chennai itself, there was no requirement for petitioner to travel to USA - Petitioner's son-in-law's father is terminally ill with cancer and his son-in-law has to take care of his father at Chennai - Petitioner is required to travel to USA, to take care of his elder daughter who is expecting a child - Petitioner sent a letter to first respondent in this regard and there is no response till date – Held, In reply, learned counsel for petitioner submitted that petitioner is not arrested in Crime registered by Central Bureau of Investigation and he is cooperating with enquiry - In Special C.C., he received summons and appeared before Court - He filed a petition under Section 88 CRPC praying Court to accept his appearance before Court and bond to be executed as directed, for further appearance before the Court - IX Additional Special Court for CBI cases allowed this petition and granted bail to him on executing a bond with one surety for a like sum to satisfaction of Court - Petitioner shall furnish address of his daughters in USA and his contact details at USA viz., telephone/mobile numbers, e-mail address etc. to respondents - Petitioner shall return to India - Petitioner shall give special vakalath to his Advocate to participate in proceedings in Special C.C. pending on the file of IX Additional Special Court for CBI cases, including trial of case, without making any technical objection with regard to his identity or other aspects. In fine, Crl.O.P. are allowed.

JUDGMENT :

(Prayer: Criminal Original Petitions are filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the respondents to permit/allow the petitioner to travel abroad to the USA on the condition to return to India on or before 31st August 2022.)

1. These Criminal Original Petitions are filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973, seeking permission to travel abroad to USA by the petitioner.

2. Petitioner is shown as an accused in Ref.Crime No.9 of 2018 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Central Bureau of Investigation, Banking Security and Fraud Cell, Bangalore for offences under Sections 120-B r/w. 409, 420 IPC and under Sections 13(2) r/w. 13(1) (d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Petitioner has never been arrested in this case nor has he applied for pre-arrest bail. He has been co-operating in the investigation of the first respondent. This petition is filed seeking permission to travel to USA for a period of six months to take care of his first daughter, who is due for delivery. Petitioner had earlier moved Crl.O.P.No.12877 of 2020 praying permission to travel to USA and return to India on 31st December 2020 to attend marriage of petitioner's daughter scheduled to take place on 04.11.2020. Due to Covid-19, the wedding was postponed to 25.04.2021. Thereafter, petitioner withdrew the petition on 30.09.2020, informing the said fact before the Court. Once again, petitioner approached this Court to attend the marriage. He filed Crl.O.P.No.619 of 2021 and this Court on 04.03.2021 permitted the petitioner to travel abroad with certain conditions. Since, petitioner's daughter's marriage was shifted to Chennai and conducted in Chennai itself, there was no requirement for the petitioner to travel to USA. Petitioner's son-in-law's father is terminally ill with cancer and his son-in-law has to take care of his father at Chennai. Petitioner is required to travel to USA, to take care of his elder daughter who is expecting a child. Petitioner sent a letter to first respondent on 18.12.2021 in this regard and there is no response till date. There was look out circular No.1842564 issued against the petitioner. Petitioner understands that look out circular expired with effect from 23.04.2021. Look out circular has not been re-extended and there exists no embargo for the petitioner to travel abroad. Petitioner now seeks permission to travel to USA for a period of six months and he is prepared to abide by conditions imposed by this Court.

3. Respondents opposed these petitions and the first respondent filed statement of objections, objecting to the petitioner's prayer seeking permission to travel to USA. The objections of the first respondent for the limited purpose of considering this petition, in brief, is as follows,

The case No.RC-09(E)/2018 registered by CBI, BS & FC, Bangalore, against M/s.Axcel Sunshine Limited (A-1) and 38 other accused, unknown public servants and other unknown persons under Sections 120-B r/w 409, 420 IPC and Section 13 (2) r/w 13 (1) (d) of Prevention and Corruption Act 1988, based on the directions issued by Central Vigilance Commission, New Delhi. The allegations in brief, are that credit facilities of Euros 52 million was sanctioned and disbursed to M/s.WinWind Oyo during 2010-2011 and this account became NPA to the extent of Rs.393 crores in 2013. Senior Management of IDBI Bank Limited, in criminal conspiracy with private persons and in violation of extant guidelines, instructions and procedures of RBI extended a further loan of Rs.530 crores to one M/s.Axcel Sunshine Limited, another entity of the same group of companies during 2014 and adjusted the NPA and other overdue accounts of the group of companies, thus, causing a wrongful loss of more than Rs.600 crores to IDBI Bank. It is alleged that though the credit facilities advanced to M/s.WinWind Oyo became NPA, accused Senior Management officials of IDBI Bank Limited entered into a criminal conspiracy with the accused P

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top