SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 366

R.VIJAYAKUMAR
R. Joseph – Appellant
Versus
Tamil Nadu Housing Board – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : T. Lajapathi Roy.
For the Respondent: Mohamed Aathiff.

JUDGMENT :

R. VIJAYAKUMAR, J.

Prayer: Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of C.P.C. to set aside the judgment and decree dated 26.11.2018 passed in A.S. No. 63 of 2013 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Thoothukudi confirming the judgment and decree dated 05.01.2011 passed in O.S. No. 565 of 2008 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Thoothukudi.

1. The defendant is the appellant.

2. The plaintiff filed O.S. No. 565 of 2008 before the Principal District Munsif Court, Thoothukudi for mandatory injunction against the defendant to remove the construction made by the defendant in the second schedule property and for removal of encroachment in the second schedule property. The suit was decreed by the trial Court. The defendant filed A.S. No. 63 of 2013 before the Subordinate Court, Thoothukudi. The learned Subordinate Judge dismissed the appeal. As against the concurrent finding, the defendant has filed the above second appeal.

3. The Tamil Nadu Housing Board as plaintiff has filed the suit contending that the plaint schedule properties were acquired in an award dated 29.07.1988. They are in possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule properties from 13.09.1989 onwards. Acc

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top