SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 370

S.KANNAMMAL
Malligeswari – Appellant
Versus
Sakthi Kiruba – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :S.P. Yuvaraj, Advocate.
For the Respondent:S. Arunkumar, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

(Prayer: This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the Judgment and Decree, dated 19.09.2017 made in M.C.O.P.No.596 of 2016 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal and Special District Judge, Salem.)

1. The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed by the appellants/claimants seeking enhancement of compensation granted by the Tribunal in the award, dated 19.09.2017 in M.C.O.P.No.596 of 2016 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal and Special District Judge, Salem.

2. The appellants are claimants before the Tribunal in M.C.O.P.No.596 of 2016 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal and Special District Judge, Salem. They filed the said claim petition claiming a sum of Rs.20,00,000/- as compensation for the death of one Rathinam, who died in the accident that took place on 14.02.2016. According to the claimants, on 14.02.2016 at about 7.00 pm, the deceased was riding Hero Passion pro motorcycle bearing registration No.TN 90 A 2740. On the extreme left side of the Salem to Kondalampatti main

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top