SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 374

S.KANNAMMAL
Gopalakrishnan – Appellant
Versus
K. Vadivel – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :K. Varadha Kamaraj, Advocate.
For the Respondent:R. Sree Vidhya, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

(Prayer: This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the Judgment and Decree dated 19.01.2015 made in M.C.O.P.No.1387 of 2009 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, II Additional District and Sessions Court, Tirupur.)

1. This is an appeal by the claimant. The claimant is aggrieved by the sum of Rs.1,93,000/- awarded by the Tribunal in and by the award dated 19.01.2015 in M.C.O.P.No.1387 of 2009 filed by him.

2. The claimant has filed the M.C.O.P.No.1387 of 2009 seeking compensation from the respondents, who are driver of the bus, owner of the bus and its insurer. According to the claimant on 02.08.2009 at about 8.30 a.m., when he was traveling as a pillion rider in the TVS Moped driven by one Gopinath, near Pandian Nagar, Thirumuruganpoondi Road, the bus bearing Registration No.TN-39-NT-2459 was driven by the 1st respondent in a rash and negligent manner and hit the two-wheeler driven by the said Gopinath. In the impact, the claimant sustained grievous injuries and admitted in Government Hospital, Tir

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top