SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 2925

G.CHANDRASEKHARAN
Arumugam – Appellant
Versus
Janani Iswarya – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr.V.Sakkarapani
For the Respondent: Mr.C.Arun Kumar

ORDER :

1. This Criminal Revision Case is filed against the order passed in M.C.No.5 of 2016 by the learned Judge, Family Court, Dharmapuri.

2. The revision petitioner filed a petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C seeking maintenance from the respondents 1 and 2, who are his daughter and son. It is seen from the case of the petitioner that he married his wife Navajothi in 1982 and out of that wedlock, respondents were born. He was living with his family in Ponnagaram and was doing Sound System Business. Then petitioner shifted to Dharmapuri to provide good education to the respondents in 1996. He enrolled them in Chandra Bala Subramaniam School and Sri Vijay Vidhyalaya School and gave good education. He hired shop and was running 'Niranjan Engineering Works' in SR complex and doing the repair of two wheelers and lathe work. He made arrangements for the second respondent to pursue Higher Secondary Education with Vidhya Vikas in Thiruchengodu. He had done B.E., and M.E., in Sasthra University, Thanjure. Petitioner met the educational expenses. First respondent completed her +2 at Vijay Vidhyala Higher Secondary School, Dharmapuri and she completed her Teacher Training at Fathima Teacher Tr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top