SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 2923

P.VELMURUGAN
Sankar – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. R. Sankarasubbu.
For the Respondent: Mr. R. Suryaprakash.

JUDGMENT :

This Criminal Appeal is filed challenging the judgment passed on 11.12.2018 in Spl.Sessions Case No.27/2018 on the file of Mahila Court, Cuddalore.

2. The respondent police registered the case against the appellant in Crime No.4/2018 for the offence under Section 6 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (hereinafter called as “POCSO Act”) Section 9 of Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006, Section 294(b) and 506(ii) of IPC. After investigation, the respondent police laid charge sheet before the learned Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Cuddalore. The Mahila Court, after taking the case on file in Spl.S.C.No.27/2018, framed charges against the appellant for the offence under Section 6 of POCSO Act, Section 9 of Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, Section 294(b) and 506(ii) of IPC and the same have been read over and explained to the appellant/accused who denied the charges and claimed to be tried.

3. After framing charges, in order to prove the case, on the side of the Prosecution, P.Ws.1 to 9 have been examined, Exhibits P.1 to P.11 have been marked. When the appellant/accused has been questioned under Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in r

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top