SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 2899

P.VELMURUGAN
Shankar – Appellant
Versus
State by Deputy Inspector of Police, Kangeyam – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Ms. P. Selvi.
For the Respondent: Mr. R. Surya Prakash.

JUDGMENT :

P. VELMURUGAN, J.

1. This appeal has been filed to set aside the Judgment and Conviction passed in Spl. S.C. No. 33 of 2018 dated 15.04.2019 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Fast Track Mahila Court, Tiruppur.

2. The respondent police registered a case against the appellant for the offence under Sections 341, 506(ii) of IPC and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of [Harassment of Woman] Act, 1998. After investigation, the respondent laid a charge-sheet before the Magalir Neethimandram (Fast Track Mahila Court), Tiruppur for the offence under Sections 341, 506(ii) of IPC and Section 7 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. The learned Special Judge, taken the charge-sheet on file in Spl. S.C. No. 33 of 2018 and after completing the formalities, framed charges against the appellant for the offence under Sections 341, 506(ii) of IPC and Section 7 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.

3. After framing of the charges, during trial, in order to prove the case of the prosecution, on the side of the prosecution, as many as 5 witnesses were examined as PW-1 to PW-5 and 6 exhibits were marked as Exs.P1 to P6. No material object was mark

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top