Baskaran vs State Rep. by Inspector of Police, Panruti Police Station

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2021 Supreme(Mad) 3010

P.N.PRAKASH, R.PONGIAPPAN
Baskaran – Appellant
Versus
State Rep. by Inspector of Police, Panruti Police Station – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. C.S.S. Pillai.
For the Respondent: Mr. M. Babu Muthu Meeran

JUDGMENT :

R. PONGIAPPAN, J.

1. The present appeal has been filed challenging the conviction and sentence passed against the appellant in S.C. No. 93 of 2014 dated 22.06.2015, on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Cuddalore. In the trial Court, the appellant/accused stood charged for the offence under Sections 376(1), 302 and 379 IPC. He denied the same and opted for trial.

2. After full pledged trial, the learned Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Cuddalore, found the accused guilty of the offence under sections 376(1), 302 and 379 IPC and sentenced as follows:

Offence	Sentence
302 of IPC	To undergo life imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/- in default, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months.
376(1) of IPC	To undergo rigorous imprisonment for 10 years and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/- in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months.
379 of IPC	To undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years.

Challenging the said conviction and sentence, the accused is before this Court, by filing the present Crimin

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2021 Supreme(Mad) 3010

P.N.PRAKASH, R.PONGIAPPANBaskaran – AppellantVersusState Rep. by Inspector of Police, Panruti Police Station – Respondent

P.N.PRAKASH, R.PONGIAPPAN
Baskaran – Appellant
Versus
State Rep. by Inspector of Police, Panruti Police Station – Respondent