RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN
H. Arunmozhi Devan – Appellant
Versus
State, Represented by The Inspector of Police, Bargur Police Station, Krishnagiri – Respondent
ORDER :
The matter is heard through "Video Conference".
The newly added third accused is the revision petitioner herein. This Criminal Revision Case has been preferred by the petitioner against the order passed under Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure taking congnizance against the petitioner in a case of offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code in Crl.M.P.No.86 of 2015 in S.C.No.61 of 2010 by the learned Additional District Judge, Krishnagiri.
2. The respondent/Inspector of Police, Bargur police station, Krishnagiri District, has registered a case against the first accused namely Ansar and the second accused namely Balan in Crime No.370 of 2009 for the offence under Section 302 IPC. After investigation, the Investigating Officer, has filed a final report against those two accused.
3. The case of the prosecution, in brief, is as follows:-
[i] On 24.07.2009 at about 9.30 p.m., the first accused Ansar and the second accused Balan and the deceased Periyadurai went to a Liquor shop near S.K.Dhaba on the By-pass road in Bargur in the Autorickshaw of one Annamalai (L.W.14). After consuming liquor, as they were returning home in the same auto, the first accused took a sum
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.