IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R. PONGIAPPAN, J.
Saravanan S/o Palanisamy – Appellant
Versus
State Rep. by the Inspector of Police All Women Police Station, Coimbatore – Respondent
Crl. Appeal No. 105 of 2014
Decided On : 22-12-2020
Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 306, 498A, 309 r/w 498A – Criminal Procedural Code, 1973 - Section 313 - Criminal Appeal - Dying declaration - Abetment of suicide - Husband or relative of husband of a woman subjecting her to cruelty - Deceased is wife of appellant - Further, she is adopted daughter of PW-1 - After marriage between deceased and accused, both of them were residing in same roof, which belongs to PW-1 - Accused often came to his house in a drunken mood and ill treated deceased, by suspecting her chastity. Prior to two months from date of occurrence, deceased is suffering from some mental illness. On date of occurrence, when at time, PW-1 returned to his house, deceased was wandering around setting herself on fire. But at same time, in front of his house accused was cleaning his motorcycle - Only at instance of PW-1, he put water on deceased to set off fire - After said incident, deceased was brought to Government Hospital, Coimbatore, in which she was admitted as inpatient. PW-3 admitted deceased in hospital he has informed the said occurrence to Police Station - Whether alleged occurrence had happened as stated by prosecution – Held, Court comes to conclusion that for offence under Section 306 of IPC, the trial Court without considering above said aspects, only by believing dying declaration given by deceased, convicted appellant, which is not proper - Conviction and sentence awarded for offence under Section 498A of IPC, at any point of time PW-1, who is father of deceased, did not say anything about cruelty committed by appellant. Particularly, evidence given by PW-1 is not in respect of dowry demand made by the appellant - Cruelty within meaning of Section 498-A IPC has been explained in Explanation to Section 498-A - It consists of two clauses viz. Clauses (a) and (b) - To attract Section 498-A IPC, it must be established that cruelty or harassment to wife was to force her to cause grave bodily injury to herself or to commit suicide - Dying declaration given by deceased is clear that only due to the act committed by the appellant, she was forced to commit suicide. Therefore, Court is of considered opinion that findings arrived by trial Court is found correct that appellant herein has committed offence under Section 498-A IPC - Criminal Appeal is partly-allowed.
JUDGMENT :
R. PONGIAPPAN, J.
1. The present Criminal Appeal has been filed to set aside the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 09.10.2013, passed in S.C. No. 6 of 2011 by the learned Sessions Judge, Magalir Neethimandram, (Mahila Court), Coimbatore.
2. The appellant herein is the sole accused in S.C. No. 6 of 2011 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Coimbatore. He stood charged for the offences under Sections 498A and 306 of IPC. By judgment dated 09.10.2013, the trial Court convicted the appellant under Section 498A of IPC and sentenced him to undergo one year rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs. 5,000/- in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one month. Further he was convicted for the offence under Section 306 of IPC and sentenced to undergo seven years of rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months. Challenging the said conviction and sentence the appellant is before this Court with this appeal.
3. The case of the prosecution, in brief, is as follows:
(ii) On receipt of the information, PW-6 Mrs. Parameswari, the then learned Judicial Magistrate-I, Coimbatore rushed to the Government Hospital, Coimbatore and recorded the dying declaration given by the deceased in the presence of PW-2 Dr. Narayanasamy, attached with the Government Hospital, Coimbatore. After recording the dying declaration, the learned Magistrate obtained left leg finger impression due to the reason that her thumb impression is not available. Further in respect of recording dying declaration, PW-2 Dr. Narayanasamy gave certificate that the deceased was in conscious and having the mental fitness, for giving dying declaration.
(iii) In the mean while, PW-9, Ananthalakshmi, the then Sub Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Perur, on intimation from the out post police at Coimbatore Government Hospital, rushed to the Government Hospital, Coimbatore and recorded the oral statement given by the deceased Rani. Upon the statement given by the said Rani, she registered a case in Crime No. 17 of 2010 for the offences under Section 309 r/w 498A of IPC. The printed FIR was marked as Ex.P.9 and the statement given by the deceased Rani was marked as Ex.P.11.
(iv) After the preparation of FIR, PW-9 visited the scene of occurrence and in the presence of PW-5, Chinnasamy, she prepared the observation Mahazar under Ex.P.4 and had drawn the rough sketch under Ex.P.10. She also seized one kerosene cane, match box and one nighty in burned condition through seizure mahazar, which has been marked as Ex.P.5. The recovered materials are marked as M.O.1 to M.O.3. She also arrested the accused and sent him for judicial custody. Further, she received the death intimation from the Government Hospital and then, she altered the Sections of law from 309 r/w 498A of IPC to Sections 306 and 498A of IPC. Th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.