ORDER :

Heard the learned counsel on either side.

2. The petitioner herein was prosecuted for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act in C.C. No.114 of 2005 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Kulithalai.

3. The case ended in conviction and sentence. Challenging the same, the petitioner filed C.A.No.40 of 2014 before the Sessions Judge, Mahila Fast Track Court, Karur. The learned appellate Judge vide Judgment dated 09.02.2016 confirmed the conviction and modified and reduced the sentence. Challenging the same, this criminal revision case came to be filed.

4. The learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner reiterated all the contentions set out in the memorandum of grounds and wanted this Court to set aside the impugned Judgments and acquit the revision petitioner and allow this revision case.

5. Per contra the learned counsel appearing for the complainant submitted that the impugned Judgment do not call for any interference.

6. I carefully considered the rival contentions and also went through the evidence on record.

7. The case of the compl