SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 2777

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA
Rajapoomani, W/o. Lourdhusami – Appellant
Versus
Balakalaivani, W/o. Ragu – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.A.Gokulakrishnan
For the Respondent: Mr.Stalin Abhimanyu

ORDER :

This Criminal Revision Case has been preferred by the Revision Petitioner seeking to call for the records and set aside the Judgment in C.A.No.12 of 2014, dated 06.09.2014, on the file of the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Puducherry, confirming the Judgment of the Trial Court in C.C.No.30 of 2011, on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Puducherry, dated 14.03.2014.

2. For the sake of convenience, the Petitioner and the Respondent will be referred to as Accused and Complainant, respectively.

3. It is the case of the complainant that on 22.02.2010, the accused approached her and borrowed a sum of Rs.66,000/- to meet out family expenses. To witness the said borrowal, the accused had issued a post dated cheque/Ex.P1, bearing No.918744, dated 27.05.2010, drawn on the Indian Overseas Bank, Reddiarpalayam, Pondicherry. After due intimation to the accused, she had presented the cheque for collection on 27.05.2010, through Indian Bank, Mudaliarpet Branch and the cheque had been returned by the banker through a memo/Ex.P2, dated 20.05.2010, with an endorsement “insufficient funds”. The Complainant had informed about the dishonour of cheque to the accused even then she

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top