SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 2803

K.MURALI SHANKAR
P. Pitchiyappan – Appellant
Versus
Karpagam – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. G. Marimuthu.
For the Respondents: Mr. Rajesh Saravanan, Mr. V. Neelakandan.

ORDER :

1. The Criminal Revision Case has been filed under Sections 397 and 401 Cr.P.C. challenging the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Rajapalayam in Crl. M.P. No. 546 of 2017 on 19.01.2017, dismissing the petition filed under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C.

2. The revision petitioner has filed a petition under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. against the respondents 1 to 3 alleging that the property situated in Door No. 236-A, North Malaiyadipatti, Rajapalayam, Virudhunagar District, was purchased by one Chinna Petchiappan and his wife Sankarammal on 05.10.1987, that since both of them had no issues, they have executed a Will in favour of Chinna Petchiappan's elder brother's son/ Pitchiyappan, the petitioner herein on 09.08.2001, settling the said property in his favour; that the said Chinna Petchiappan and his wife Sankarammal had died on 01.09.2010 and 22.12.2009 respectively, that thereafter the petitioner has become the owner of the suit property and he is in enjoyment of the same, that the first accused claiming to be the adopted daughter of the said Chinna Petchiappan and Sankarammal, had created a joint settlement deed on 22.09.2010 in favour of her husband/second respondent,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top