SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 2757

S.ANANTHI
Srinivasan – Appellant
Versus
R. Valli – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr.C. Jeyaprakash

ORDER :

This criminal revision case has been filed as against the concurrent findings on a complaint instituted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

2. The trial Court, namely, the learned Principal District Munsif-cum- Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi, found this petitioner guilty under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, in S.T.C No.454 of 2005 and by order, dated 24.11.2011, convicted and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for One year and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/-, in default, to undergo imprisonment for Two months for the offence he was stood charged. As against the conviction and sentence, the petitioner has preferred an appeal and the learned Fast Track Mahila Judge, Sivaganga, by order dated 13.07.2016, in C.A.No.53 of 2011, confirmed the conviction and sentence imposed by the trial Court. Aggrieved over the same, the petitioner has preferred the instant revision case.

3. The case of the respondent/complainant is that the wife of the petitioner/accused borrowed a sum of Rs.2,60,000/-and in discharge of the debt had issued a cheque for Rs.3 Lakhs, dated 24.01.2005. The cheque was drawn on ICICI Bank Ltd., Karaikudi. The complainant had presented the ch

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top