K.MURALI SHANKAR
R. Vijaya Rani – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Superintendent of Police – Respondent
ORDER :
This Criminal Revision is directed against the order passed in Crl.M.P.No. 1333 of 2017 in C.C.No.124 of 2010 dated 12.04.2017, by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Thiruchirappalli dismissing the petition filed under Section 302 Cr.P.C.,
2. At the outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would contend that they have filed an application before the trial Court to permit her to appoint three named Advocates as her Advocates to assist the prosecution, but, the provision of law was wrongly quoted as 302 Cr.P.C., instead of Section 301(2) Cr.P.C., and that the trial Court without considering the relief claimed, has treated the petition, as if the same was filed under Section 302 Cr.P.C., dismissed the same. It is not known as to whether the above said wrong quoting of provision of law was brought to the notice of the trial Court, but, whatever it is, as rightly contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner, in the affidavit filed in support of the above application, prayed that the Court may be pleased to allow her to appoint Mr.S. Balasubramanian, Mr.V. Udhayakumar and Ms.R.Sakunthala as her advocates to assist the prosecution in her favour and the same w
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.