IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.N. PRAKASH, R.N. MANJULA, JJ.
Rajalakshmi – Petitioner
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
H.C.P. No. 1608 of 2020
Decided On : 08-10-2021
Passport Act, 1967 - Sections 12(1A)(b) and 12(2) - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 294(b), 323, 506(I) 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 511 - Foreigners Act, 1946 - Section 3,(2)(e), (a), 4 - Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 22(4), 19 and 2 - Refugee - Preparing Fake Documents - A Sri Lankan national, is said to have come to India under a Tourist Visa and due to ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka, he did not return to Sri Lanka, but, chose to stay in India as an ‘out refugee’ and report before Inspector of Police, C-1, Police Station - He is said to have got married to an Indian citizen - Petitioner's husband was arrested for preparing fake documents for obtaining visa, stickers to be pasted in visa, changed photos of holders in passport copies, to use same in foreign countries to open bank account, obtain loan and thus helped his associates to cheat Government - Held, A Sri Lankan refugee can either choose to reside in any one of 107 refugee camps or stay as an ‘out refugee’ and report in local police station - However, he loses these privileges if he gets involved in an offence in India and thereafter, his place of stay could possibly be only in special camp at Trichy until State Government decides to dislodge him – Court hold that a petition challenging an order passed by State Government under Section 3(2)(e) of Foreigners Act cannot be registered as a habeas corpus petition and at most, be registered as a writ petition to be heard by a single Bench, as could be inferred from Division Bench judgment of this Court in Karunairaj – Court direct Registry to place matter before Hon'ble Chief Justice for appropriate directions to number a petition challenging an order passed by State Government under Section 3(2)(e) of Foreigners Act or any consequential order, as a writ petition to be heard by a Single Bench, and not as a habeas corpus petition - Petition dismissed.
ORDER :
1. One Rasakrishnan @ Radhakrishnan @ Raasa @ Ramesh, a Sri Lankan national, is said to have come to India in 2003 under a Tourist Visa and due to the ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka, he did not return to Sri Lanka, but, chose to stay in India as an ‘out refugee’ and report before the Inspector of Police, C-1, Madippakkam Police Station. He is said to have got married to Rajalakshmi, an Indian citizen who is the petitioner herein, on 31.08.2003. The criminal antecedents of Radhakrishnan have been set out in the counter affidavit of the Deputy Secretaries to Government, Public (Foreigners) Department and Protocol, Public Department, at paragraph 3, which reads as under:
(i) CCB Cr. No. 454/2009 under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 511 IPC, CC No. 10138 of 2014 in CCB Special Court.
(ii) J8 Neelankarai Police Station Cr. No. 10/14 under Sections 294(b), 323 and 506(I) IPC.
(iii) S7 Madipakkam Police Station Cr. No. 34/2014 under Sections 341, 324 and 506(II) IPC - CC No. 785/2014 at Judicial Magistrate, Alandur.
It is also submitted that during the course of investigation, 16 items of incriminating records and articles and material objects (like passports in various names, Aadhar cards, various bank account statements, mobile phones, laptop and a copy of Canada Visa sticker etc. were seized from Thiru Rasa @ Rasakrishnan @ Ramesh @ Radhakrishnan Dharmadurai.”
After he was released on bail, the State Government passed an order in G.O. (1D) No. 349, Public (Foreigners-I) Department dated 26.07.2019 under Section 3(2)(e) of the Foreigners Act, 1946, lodging him in the Special Camp at Trichy, aggrieved by which, his wife Rajalakshmi has filed the present habeas corpus petition.
2. Heard Mr. R.C. Paul Kanagaraj, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. R. Shanmugasundaram, learned Advocate General assisted by Mr. R. Muniyapparaj, learned Additional Public Prosecutor and Mr. R. Sankaranarayanan, learned Additional Solicitor General assisted by Mr. Avinash Krishnan Ravi, learned Central Government Standing Counsel.
3. The main submission of Mr. R.C. Paul Kanagaraj was that the State Government, by order in G.O. No. SR 3/1137-1/2016 Public Department dated 20.09.2016, permitted fi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.