IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN, J.
K.Subramaniam - Petitioners
Vs.
Krishna Mills Pvt., Ltd., rep by its Director J.Anand – Respondent
C.R.P.No.2053 of 2020 and C.M.P.No.12898 of 2020
Decided On : 22-06-2021
Tamil Nadu Buildings Lease and Rent Control Act, 1960 - Sections 25, 10(2)(1), 23, 23(2) and 11 - Landlord for fixing fair rent - Tenant took the property - Allegation and stated that tenant took front portion of subject property measuring an extent of 5,000 square feet in the year 1989 on a monthly rent landlord and thereafter took another portion of the said godown measuring an extent of 4,200 square feet situated in north of the front portion in October, 2000 on a monthly rent tenant took rear portion of the godown measuring an extent of 4,200 square feet on a monthly rent landlord and earlier, the tenant had taken another ground on measuring 500 square feet a monthly rent landlord and ever since of taking of the possession by the tenant – Held, arrears of rent accumulated from the date of petition Hon'ble Supreme Court ordered dismissing - It is seen from the orders passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court that the Hon'ble Supreme Court has not interferred with the findings of order - counsel for the petitioner, that they started paying the revised fair rent fixed by this Court even before filing SLP - Mere payment of fair rent does not absolve tenant from his conduct of willful default as a tenant as on date of payment of the revised fair rent fixed by this court was still in due of the accumulated arrears from the original - Court has no hesitation in holding that the fair rent has attained finality when statutory remedy available has been exhausted by the tenant and when this Court finally decided the revision petition in CRP No.2511 of 2008 refixing the fair rent and the payment made by the tenant after dismissal - Civil Revision Petition stands dismissed.
ORDER :
The present Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 25 of Tamil Nadu Buildings Lease and Rent Control Act, 1960 as against the Fair and Decreetal order passed in R.C.A No.32 of 2019 dated 25.02.2020 by the learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Coimbatore reversing the finding made in R.C.O.P.No.134 of 2007 dated 06.02.2019 on the file of learned First Additional District Munsif, Coimbatore.
2. The Tenant since deceased, his legal heirs are the Revision Petitioners before this Court. Initially R.C.O.P.No.44 of 2005 was filed by the landlord for fixing fair rent as Rs.2,43,600/- before the learned I Additional District Munsif, Coimbatore. Thereafter, R.C.O.P.No.134 of 2007 was filed by the landlord under Section 10(2)(1) of Tamilnadu Buildings Lease and Rent Control Act, 1960 on the fact that the tenant took the property measuring 16,500 square feet from the previous management of the landlord. During the year 1999, the tenant took front portion of 5,000 square feet on the monthly rent of Rs.15,000/- and thereafter, the northern portion measuring an another 5,000 square feet of land and building was taken on lease by the tenant during October, 2000 for a monthly rent of Rs.15,000/-. Further, a separate shed on the western side measuring 500 square feet was given on lease to the tenant from 01.05.2000 on a monthly rent of Rs.3,000/- and an extent of 5000 was rented out to the tenant in October, 2001 on a monthly rent of Rs.15,000/-, totally an extent of 15,500 square feet of land and building on a monthly rent of Rs.48,000/- was to be paid by the tenant. However, the tenant seems to have been contending that the monthly rent is only Rs.33,000/-. Meanwhile, the landlord had taken out the petition in R.C.O.P.No.44 of 2005 for fixing of fair rent in which fair rent proceedings the tenant has submitted his trading profit and loss account for the year ended 31.03.2000 had shown the monthly rent payable to the landlord as Rs.48,000/-, which seems to have been admitted in the cross examination in R.C.O.P.No.44 of 2005. The landlord was receiving the reduced rent without prejudice to their right held that from 01.10.2000 till 01.07.2007, the tenant has defaulted to pay the balance of Rs.15,000/- as monthly rent. Furthermore, in the fair rent case filed by the landlord, the fair rent was fixed as Rs.2,43,600/- from 01.02.2005, the tenant has not paid the said fair rent so fixed and continued to pay Rs.33,000/- per month. Despite there being an order of the court in fair rent, the tenant had willfully defaulted the rent and liable to be evicted on the ground of willful default.
3. As per the counter filed by the tenant in R.C.O.P.No. 134 of 2007 filed for eviction, the tenant had denied the allegation and stated that the tenant took the front portion of the subject property measuring an extent of 5,000 square feet in the year 1989 on a monthly rent of Rs.15,000/- from the landlord and thereafter took another portion of the said godown measuring an extent of 4,200 square feet situated in north of the front portion in October, 2000 on a monthly rent of Rs.10,000/-. Thereafter, in October, 2001 the tenant took the rear portion of the godown measuring an extent of 4,200 square feet on a monthly rent of Rs.5,000/- from the landlord and earlier, the tenant had taken another ground on measuring 500 square feet on 01.05.2000 on a monthly rent of Rs.3,000/- from the landlord and ever since of taking of the possession by the tenant, the monthly rent for the above said godowns and the adjacent building is Rs. 33,000/- and not Rs.48,000/- .
4. Meanwhile, as against the fair and final order made in R.C.O.P.No.44 of 2005 dated 10.01.2007 passed by the learned I Additional Munsif, Coimbatore, who had fixed the fair rent at Rs.2,43,600/-, R.C.A.No.21 of 2007, was filed by the tenant and R.C.A.No.24 of 2007, was filed by the landlord, the app
Arjunan Vs. Universal Fertilizer co
Girdharilal chandak and Bros. And others Vs. S.Mehdi Ispahani and others
N.Kamalam (Dead) and Another Vs. Ayyasamy and Another
Chairman and MD, NTPC Ltd., Vs. Reshmi Constructions Builders and contractors]
Superintendent (Tech.I) Central Excise, I.D.D.Jabalpur and others Vs. Pratap Rai]
Girdharilal chandak and Bros. And others Vs. S.Mehdi Ispahani and others
Atma Ram Properties (P) Ltd vs. Federal Motors (P) Ltd {2005 (1) SCC 705
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.