T.S.SIVAGNANAM, S.ANANTHI
V. Mahalingam – Appellant
Versus
Principal District Judge – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
T.S. SIVAGNANAM, J.
With the consent on either side, this Writ Appeal is taken up for final disposal. In the light of the orders we propose to pass in the Writ Appeal, notice to the respondents 3 to 8 is dispensed with.
2. This Writ Appeal has been filed against the order, dated 24.01.2018 passed in W.P.(MD).No.16063 of 2017.
3. The appellant, who was a practising Advocate in the District Court, Madurai and who is now no more, sought for quashing the order passed by the first respondent, dated 12.07.2017, cancelling the allotment of the Chamber in the District Court Complex in Chamber No.19. The Writ Petition has been dismissed by the impugned order and it appears that there was a huge arrears of rent payable by the deceased appellant.
4. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that during the pendency of this appeal, the arrears of rent have been paid. In this regard, the learned counsel appearing for the respondents does not have any instructions.
5. Heard Mr.T.Lajapathi Roy, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.N.Tamil Mani, learned counsel appearing for the first respondent.
6. Be that as it may, since the appellant is no more, it is no
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.