G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
Sarathambal @ Saratha – Appellant
Versus
Muthuganesan – Respondent
ORDER :
The Civil Revision Petition is filed to strike off the plaint in O.S.No.207 of 2016 on the file of the District Munsif Court at Dharapuram.
2. The petitioners are defendants 1 to 4 in the suit filed by the 1st respondent herein. The 1st respondent filed the suit for declaration declaring that the Power of Attorney dated 15.07.2016 was registered vide document 1128 of 2016 is fraudulent and invalid with reference to the 1st item of the suit schedule property. Further prayed for permanent injunction restraining the defendants 3 to 6 from executing and registering any conveyance or documents in respect of the 1st item of the suit schedule property on the strength of the Power of Attorney dated 15.07.2016.
3. Mr.T.Muthugamanickam, learned Senior Counsel would submit that the petitioners 1 and 2 are maternal aunts of the 1st respondent herein, i.e., the 1st respondent's father's own sisters. The 1st respondent already filed a suit for partition in which the petitioners 1 and 2 are the defendants 24 and 25 respectively. The preliminary decree was passed and allotted 5/16th share to the 2nd petitioner herein, in respect of the A and B schedule property and remaining property equally
Dahiben Vs.Arvindbhai Kalyanji Bhanusali (Gajra) Dead through Legal Representatives and others
Ganapathi Subramanian Vs. S.Ramalingam
I.T.C Ltd. v.Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal
M.Prince Manohar Vs. Bhima Lakshmi Narashammah
Madanuri Sri Ramachandra Murthy V.Syed Jalal
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.