BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
M.S. Ramesh, J.
Mohamed Ibrahim - Petitioner
Versus
The Chairman & Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd., and ors. – Respondents
W.P.(MD) No.15115 of 2020 and W.M.P.(MD) No.12724 of 2020
Decided On : 17-03-2021
Post of Assistant Engineer - Fitness to perform - Medical Board - Defective colour vision - Petitioner herein is one among candidates who was selected to post of Assistant Engineer (Electrical) and allotted to SC/Karur Electricity Distribution Circle, under Backward Class - Muslim / BC(M) category on merit basis - Based on Assistant Executive Engineer's letter dated stating that petitioner had "colour blindness", he was referred to Medical Board/MGM Trichy, Ophthalmology Department to verify his fitness to work as an Assistant Engineer - Medical report also stated petitioner's fitness to work as Assistant Engineer (Electrical) cannot be opined since norms regarding colour vision was not provided by Employer - Consequently on respondents had referred the petitioner to Regional Medical Board, Medical College Hospital by enclosing work norms of Assistant Engineer (Electrical) and requested Medical Board to certify with regard to his fitness to perform his duties as an Assistant Engineer - Once again, Medical Board of Thanjavur College Hospital, through its report dated had remarked that candidate has 'defective colour vision' and since no visual norms for colour vision was specified, his fitness to exercise his duties cannot be certified - Whether a candidate holding post would be disentitled or unfit to perform such duties, functions or responsibilities, determination requires to be made on basis of some materials supported by reports of medical experts – Held, In order to ascertain as to whether a candidate holding post would be disentitled or unfit to perform such duties, functions or responsibilities, determination requires to be made on basis of some materials supported by reports of medical experts - In absence of such materials or medical report and merely relying upon duties, functions and responsibilities for post of Assistant Engineer (Electrical), would be illogical and baseless and hence, such reasoning rendering the petitioner 'unfit', could be termed as 'arbitrary' - Appointment order requires to be revived - It would not be out of place to mention here that, in case TANGEDCO is of the view that they require to re-exercise the medical tests on petitioner with regard to his colour vision is concerned, same can always be exercised, after framing of norms with regard to such colour vision for their employees - However, such norms should be based on basis of the opinion of medical experts vis-a-vis, duties, functions and responsibilities of any post - Writ Petition stands allowed accordingly.
ORDER :
The petitioner herein is one among the candidates who was selected to the post of Assistant Engineer (Electrical) and allotted to SC/Karur Electricity Distribution Circle, under the Backward Class - Muslim / BC(M) category on merit basis. Based on the Assistant Executive Engineer's letter dated 15.04.2017 stating that the petitioner had "colour blindness", he was referred to the Medical Board/MGM Trichy, Ophthalmology Department to verify his fitness to work as an Assistant Engineer. The medical report dated 23.02.2018 of the Regional Medical Board, Thanjavur had opined as follows :-
2. The medical report also stated the petitioner's fitness to work as Assistant Engineer (Electrical) cannot be opined since norms regarding colour vision was not provided by the Employer. Consequently on 14.03.2019, the respondents had referred the petitioner to the Regional Medical Board, Thanjavur Medical College Hospital by enclosing the work norms of Assistant Engineer (Electrical) and requested the Medical Board to certify with regard to his fitness to perform his duties as an Assistant Engineer. Once again, the Medical Board of Thanjavur College Hospital, through its report dated 05.07.2019 had remarked that the candidate has 'defective colour vision' and since no visual norms for colour vision was specified, his fitness to exercise his duties cannot be certified.
3. Thereafter, the petitioner was extended with an opportunity of personal hearing before the Chief Engineer (Personal), wherein he had submitted that he was not aware of his defectiveness in colour vision until the test was performed and that he was not wearing spectacles prior to that. Not being satisfied to the reply, the petitioner was referred to a Committee of four members, which further subjected the petitioner to appear before the Regional Institute of Ophthalmologist and Government Ophthalmic Hospital, Egmore, Chennai 600 008 to ascertain his colour vision. For the third time, the Regional Medical Board at Chennai had opined that both the left and right eyes of the petitioner were 'colour vision defective'. In this background, the respondents had relied upon the various work norms to the post of an Assistant Engineer(Electrical) and the nature of his duties and had observed that the responsibility attached to the post of an Assistant Engineer(Electrical) requires him to differentiate the colour terminals to ensure correct supply of power, safety of co-workers, safety of public and safety of himself and since he was diagnosed with a colour vision defectiveness, he was rendered as 'unfit' for serving as an Assistant Engineer(Electrical), through the impugned order, dated 14.05.2020. The rejection order is put under challenge in the present writ petition.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner's vision is perfect to lead a normal life and that he was neither aware of the defective in colour vision until the tests were performed by the respondents nor did he use the assistance of the spectacles for a normal vision and therefore, there was no impediment for him to perform the duties of an Assistant Engineer. It is his further submission that since there was no norms fixed to invalidate him in the medical tests, insofar as the percentage of colour vision defectiveness is concerned, the respondents are not justified in rejecting his candidature.
5. On the other hand, the learned standing counsel for the respondent/ Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the TANGEDCO) would place reliance on the various duties, functions and responsibilities for the post of an Assistant Engineer(Electrical) and submitted that since the defect established in the medical report would hamper the work of an Assistant Engineer(Electrical), there is no infirmity in the findings of the respondents in t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.