M.GOVINDARAJ
Dheenadayalan – Appellant
Versus
T. K. Boopathi – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the decree and judgment dated 27.03.2014 passed in A.S.No.24/2006 by the learned Subordinate Judge, Poonamallee, thereby reversing the decree and judgment dated 30.01.2006 passed in O.S.No.690 of 1982 by the learned District Munsif, Poonamallee.
PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the decree and judgment dated 27.03.2014 passed in A.S.No.1/2009 by the learned Subordinate Judge, Poonamallee, thereby reversing the decree and judgment dated 30.01.2006 passed in O.S.No.690 of 1982 by the learned District Munsif, Poonamallee.
Aggrieved over the reversal of the decree and judgment of the Trial Court, the defendants have preferred the above Second Appeals.
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are called as per their rank before the Trial Court.
3. The plaintiffs filed a Suit for delivery of possession, arrears of rent and for permanent injunction.
4. The plaintiffs are the absolute owners of the Suit property. Originally, the Suit property was owned by one Bandi Srinivasa Mudaliar and he was also managing a Trust called "Nachichatram Trust". The said Trust is
PEDDINTI VENKATA MURALI RANGANATHA DESIKA IYENGAR VS. GOVERNMENT OF A.P. AND ANOTHER
D.SREENIVASA MUDALIAR CHARITY VS. DHANASEKARAN
DHARMAPURA ADHINAM MUTT VS. RAGHAVAN AND ANOTHER
PEDDINTI VENKATA MURALI RANGANATHA DESIKA IYENGAR AND OTHERS VS. GOVERNMENT OF A.P. AND ANOTHER
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.