R.PONGIAPPAN
Ganapathy Pandaram – Appellant
Versus
Arulmigu Mariamman and Vinayagar Temple, Rep. by its Trustee A. Ramasamy Kongal Nagaram, Udumalpet Taluk, Coimbatore District – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
PRAYER: Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree dated 29.10.2002 made in A.S.No.1 of 2000 on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Udumalpet, confirming the judgment and decree dated 16.09.1999 made in O.S.No.574 of 1993 on the file of the learned District Munsif, Udumalpet.
Aggrieved over the concurrent findings made in A.S.No.1 of 2000 dated 29.10.2002 on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Udumalpet and in O.S.No.574 of 1993 dated 16.09.1999 on the file of the learned District Munsif, Udumalpet, the appellants, who are the defendants 1 and 2 in the suit, have preferred this Second Appeal, praying to set aside the dismissal order passed by the Court below and to grant a decree in favour of them.
2. For the sake of convenience, hereinafter, the parties, are referred to, as per their litigative status before the trial Court.
3. The laconic averments made in the plaint, are as follows:
STATE OF TAMIL NADU vs. RAMALINGA SAMIGAL MADAM
THE IDOL OF SRI RANGANATHASWAMY vs. MAVADIAN AND OTHERS reported in (1984) 1 MLJ 43
SRI VARADARAJA PERUMAL TEMPLE vs. K.RAMACHANDRAN AND OTHERS reported in (1997) 2 LW 881
A.T.S.Chinnaswami Chettiar v. Sri Kari Varadaraja Perumal Temple 1995 Supp3 SCC 724 : 1996 1 LW 63
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.