IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
C.SARAVANAN, J.
R.J.Gajendra Kumar - Petitioner
Vs
The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by its Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Tourism, Culture and Religious Endowments Department, Secretariat, Chennai 600 009 - Respondent
W.P.No.10251 of 2020 and M.P.Nos. 12464 & 12466 of 2020
Decided On : 16-08-2021
Constitution of India,1950 - Article 226 - Tamil Nadu Government Servants (Conditions of Service) Act, 2016, - Section 25 and 54 - Appointment To - Post of Tourist officer – Promoted To - An Assistant Director - Writ petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for impugned proceedings of 1st respondent in Letter quash same and consequently direct 1st respondent to include petitioner's name in appropriate place in regular panel for year 2017-18 and consider petitioner for promotion to post of Assistant Director of Tourism with effect from 01.09.2017 - Whether Equivalence Certificate issued by Committee constituted by Government declaring that degree obtained from one University was equivalent to degree obtained from yet another University is only prospective in operation and answered issue ultimately as follows - whether petitioner was having a valid qualification for being appointed either as a Tourist Officer and/or therefore whether petitioner was eligible to be promoted as an Assistant Director? - Held, Qualification obtained by petitioner through open university cannot be questioned by respondents either for purpose of his appointment to post of Tourist officer in 2011 or for purpose of being considered to be promoted to the post of the Assistant Director - Petitioner was appointed as a Tourist Officer, G.O.Ms.No.217 in force wherein Government directed that Diploma/Under Graduate/Post Graduate Degree Courses offered by Tamil Nadu Open University shall be treated as equivalent to corresponding awards of other Universities in State under regular stream for purpose of employment in public services - Same recognition is to be given to degree obtained from Madurai Kamraj University. - Impugned order It is therefore liable to be quashed. Accordingly, it is quashed with consequential relief to petitioner - Respondents are therefore directed to place name of petitioner in seniority and promote petitioner also if petitioner’s juniors were promoted in view of stand of respondents - Court exercise shall be carried out by respondents within a period of four weeks from date of receipt of Court order - writ petition allowed
ORDER :
Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the impugned proceedings of the 1st respondent in Letter No.4937/T2- 1/2019-5 dated 22.07.2020, quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to include the petitioner's name in the appropriate place in the regular panel for the year 2017-18 and consider the petitioner for promotion to the post of Assistant Director of Tourism with effect from 01.09.2017.
This is the second round of litigation. The petitioner has challenged the impugned order dated 22.07.2019 bearing reference No.4937/T2-1/2019-5 of the 1st respondent passed pursuant to an order dated 24.10.2019 of this Court in W.P.No.18392 of 2019. Relevant portion of the impugned order reads as follows:-
4. It is pertinent to note that you have passed 10th Std (SSLC) on March 1982 and joined H.Sc(+1) first year during the academic year 1982-83 on 12.07.1982. In the meantime, you were appointed as Junior Assistant on compassionate grounds and joined in Tourism department on 25.05.1983. Later you have got admitted in the second year Foundation Course directly in Madurai Kamaraj University- Open University during 1984 and then passed a Degree in Commerce through Distance Education during 1987.
5. In this regard, it is informed that in G.O.(Ms.)No.107, Personnel & Administrative Reforms (M) Department, dated 18.08.2009, orders have been issued prescribing the degree qualification in the pattern of 10, +2, +3 for appointment/promotion to Public Services. In Letter No.33448/M/2010-4, Personnel and Administrative Reforms (M) Department, dated 03.12.2010, it has been clarified that a degree awarded by the Open Universities after passing Pre-Foundation Course and two years Foundation Course through Open University cannot be recognized a degree as per University Grants Commission norms for the purpose of employment/promotion in Public Services since such Pre-Foundation Course and 2 year Foundation Course are not contemplated in the University Grants Commission Regulations.
6. Further, in G.O.(Ms) NO.144, P & AR (M) Department, dated 20.11.2017, orders were issued that the Foundation Courses offered by various Universities are not equivalent to Higher Secondary Course (+2). As per Section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Government Servants (Conditions of Service) Act, 2016, for appointment to public service, a degree should be in the pattern of 10, +2, +3. As per Rule 5 of the Special Rules for the post of Tourist Officer, educational qualification of degree is prescribed for appointment to the post of Tourist Officer from Assistant Tourist Officer Grade II by Recruitment by transfer.
7. Considering the above orders and rules, it is found that you have not passed the degree in the regular pattern of 10 + 2 + 3 (i.e. After passing SSLC (10th )& Higher Secondary Course (+2). Hence you are not qualified to hold the post of Tourist Officer/Publication Officer. 8.I am also to inform you that there is no specific direction in the order dated 24.10.2019 in W.P.No.18392 of 2019 to promote you as Assistant Director. Therefore, your request to promote to the post of Assistant Director is not feasible as per the rules in force.”
2. By the impugned proceedings in Letter No.4937/T2-1/2019-5 dated 22.07.2020 the petitioner has been informed that the petitioner was neither qualified to be appointed to the post of Tourist Officer on promotion from the post of Assistant Tourist Officer Grade II and therefore the request of the Petitioner to promote to the post of Assistant Director was not feasible as per the rules in force.
3. It has been further observed that there was no specific direction in the order dated 24.10.2019 in W.P.No.18392 of 2019 to promote the petitioner as an
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.