SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 3100

K.MURALI SHANKAR
D. Udhayakumar – Appellant
Versus
K. Chinnadurai – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. P. Rajagopalan
For the Respondent: Mr. P. Athimoolapanidan

ORDER :

The revision is directed against the order, dated 24.07.2019 passed in E.A.No.32 of 2018 in E.P.No.145 of 2015 in O.S.No.202 of 2002 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Dindigul permitting the impleadment of third party under Order 1 Rule 10(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure.

2. The revision petitioner is the decree holder and he filed the suit for specific performance of the agreement dated 27.03.2000, that the trial Court has decreed the suit and that the first Appellate Court and the second Appellate Court have dismissed the appeals and thereby, confirming the Judgment and Decree of the trial Court. The decree holder has then laid the execution proceeding in E.P.No. 40 of 2011 and got the sale deed executed from the Court and that thereafter, he has filed the petition in E.P.No.145 of 2015 seeking delivery of the property as per the sale deed executed in his favour. When the said execution petition in E.P.No. 145 of 2015 was pending, the third party/first respondent herein has filed an application under Order 1 Rule 10(2) CPC seeking his impleadment as th

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top