C.SARAVANAN
Parasuraman – Appellant
Versus
Thangaraj – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
I have heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel for the respondents. I have perused the impugned Judgment and Decree dated 30.08.2011 passed by the Sub Court, Gingee (hereinafter referred to as First Appellate Court) in A.S.No.130 of 2005, the Judgment and Decree dated 28.06.2005 passed by the Principal District Munsif Court, Gingee (hereinafter referrred to as Trial Court) in O.S.No.471 of 2000 and documents which were filed along with this Second Appeal.
2. This appeal was listed for admission on 26.03.2012. However, on the said date, only notice of admission was ordered on the respondents. The respondents are thus represented by the learned counsel Mr. T. Dhanasekaran.
3. The appellant was plaintiff and is aggrieved by the impugned Judgment and Decree dated 30.08.2011 passed by the First Appellate Court in A.S.No.130 of 2005.
4. By the impugned Judgment and Decree dated 30.08.2011, the First Appellate Court dismissed the aforesaid appeal filed by the appellant against the Judgment and Decree dated 28.06.2005 of the Trial Court in O.S.No.471 of 2000.
5. The appellant had filed the above suit for a declaration and for a permanent injunction to rest
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.