IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.
Ravi Sam - Petitioner
Versus
Government of Tamilnadu, Rep. by Secretary to Government, Housing and Urban Development & Ors. - Respondents
W.P. No. 3640 of 2001 and W.M.P. No. 5047 of 2001
Decided On : 28-10-2021
Land Acquisition Act – Section 6,11(1),30 and 31(2) - Property - Partition deed - Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 – Section 24(2) - Case of petitioner is that his grandfather late owned property with other properties - Said one along with his wife, his sons, who is father of petitioner herein and entered into partition deed registered vide document - In the partition deed, subject property was shown as schedule 'E' and life interest was given to petitioner's grandmother and after her lifetime it devolved upon three sons into equal proportion - His grandfather died and grandmother died - Thus, their three sons succeeded subject property - Thereafter by the partition deed registered vide document, petitioner was allotted along with 14 cents of land set apart for purpose of road - Whether award has been passed after obtaining approval from competent authority as contemplated under proviso to Section 11(1) of Act – Held, in the case on hand, second respondent produced only possession certificate as if the land was taken possession and on the same day handed over to Housing Board - Except this possession certificate, no other documents produced by respondents to show that even symbolic possession of subject property has been taken already - Admittedly physical possession of property is still with the petitioner and the petitioner is in possession and enjoyment of same - Therefore, the respondents failed to follow the procedure laid down by Constitution Bench of Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in case while taking possession of subject property - Insofar as possession is concerned, after award, petitioner or his forefathers were not served with notice under Section 12 (2) of Act - Twin conditions as contemplated under Section 24 (2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 also attracted in case on hand, since the compensation amount has not been deposited and the possession of property has not been taken over - That apart, as stated supra, petitioner or his forefathers were not served with any notice under the acquisition proceedings and as such entire acquisition proceedings have lapsed and same cannot be sustained as against the petitioner insofar as the subject property - Writ petition is allowed - Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
ORDER :
The writ petition is filed to issue a writ of certiorari calling for the records of the first respondent pertaining to the notification issued under Section 4 (1) of the Act, 1894 notified in the gazatte on 20.03.1991 and the declaration made under Section 6 of Act, 1894 notified in the Gazatte on 28.05.1992 and the award proceedings in Award No.2/94 dated 23.05.1994 of the second respondent in respect of the lands measuring an extent of acre 3.03 cents comprised in SF.No.411/1 and 411/2 in Vilankurichi Village, Coimbatore North and quash the same.
2. The case of the petitioner is that his grandfather late V. Gopal Naidu owned property to an extent of 9.10 acres with other properties comprised in Vilankurichi village and other villages, Coimbatore District. The said Gopal Naidu along with his wife Chinnammal, his sons i.e. Purushothaman Naidu and G. Narayanasamy Naidu @ G.N. Sam who is the father of the petitioner herein and Krishna Naidu entered into partition deed dated 30.03.1955 registered vide document No.1272 of 1955. In the partition deed, the subject property was shown as schedule 'E' and life interest was given to the petitioner's grand mother and after her lifetime it devolved upon three sons into equal proportion. His grandfather died on 22.06.1964 and grandmother died on 03.02.1972. Thus, their three sons succeeded the subject property. Thereafter by the partition deed dated 15.05.1991 registered vide document No.2861 of 1991, the petitioner was allotted to an extent of 2.89 acres in SF.No.411 along with 14 cents of land set apart for the purpose of road. Thus, he was allotted to an extent of 3 acres and 3 cents in SF.No.411. The total extent of the land in SF.No.411 is 9.10 acres. It was divided equally to his father and his two brothers as per the partition deed. Originally the total extent of the land stood in the name of his grandfather V. Gopal Niadu as per the Resurvey and Resettlement Register. Thereafter it is entered in the name of Krishna Naidu and the petitioner's father Narayanasamy Naidu and the said property stood in the their name till the initiation of the acquisition proceedings. It was never sub-divided at any point of time. While being so, the respondents initiated acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition act, 1894 to build shelters to the shelterless people and the public as proposed to acquire to an extent of 2161.28 acres in Vilankurichi under Ganapathy Neighbourhood Scheme Phase-II. The land comprised in SF.No.411 to an extent of 10.15.5 hectares in Vilankurichi, Coimbatore District covered in Block No.2 was acquired for the formation of comprehensive Housing Scheme in Ganapathy Neighbourhood Scheme Phase-II, Vilankurichi Village. The notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter called as 'the Act') was approved by the Government in GO.Ms.No.306 Housing and Urban Development Department dated 05.03.1991 and published in the Government Gazattee dated 20.03.1991. The substance of the notification was published in two tamil dailies i.e. 'Theekadir' on 01.05.1991 and 'Pirpagal' on 02.05.1991 and also in the public locality on 30.05.1991.
2.1 The further case of the petitioner is that enquiry under Section 5A of the Act was conducted on 07.08.1991 and the objections raised by the land owners were communicated to the requisition body. The objections are found in general in nature and the objections raised by the land owners were over ruled. Draft declaration under Section 6 of the Act was approved by the Government in GO.No.269 Housing and Urban Development Department dated 26.05.1992. The draft declaration was published in the Tamilnadu Government Gazattee on 28.05.1992. The substance of the declaration was also published in 'Makkal Kural' and 'Dhinathoodhu' on 29.05.1992 and in the locality on 29.05.1992. The draft declaration under Section (7) of the Act was approved by the Government in letter dated 30.09.1992. Thereafter, notices under Sections 9
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.