SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 3146

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
ANITA SUMANTH, J.
M/s. Sri Amirthakadeswaraswamy Devasthanam Dharumapuram Adheenam - Appellant
Versus
The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Officer, Circle-I - Respondent
W.P. Nos.29312 & 29315 of 2019 & WMP.Nos.29115 & 29111 of 2019 & 2325 of 2020
Decided on : 18-02-2021

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.Satyanarayanan, Mr.R.Sivaraman, Mr. Karthikeyan, Mr.Sriram
For the Respondent: Mrs.Hema Muralikrishnan

Headnote:

Civil Procedure Code,1908 – Section 92 - Income Tax Act, 1961 – Section 10(23BBA),142(1) and 115BBE - Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act 1959 - Section 45(3) - Income–tax - Claim of exemption - Communication was thereafter issued by R2, Income Tax Officer putting the petitioners to notice that cash deposits made were proposed to be brought to tax as unaccounted cash credits in terms of Section 115 BBE of the IT Act and inviting petitioners to submit objections to this proposal - Petitioners reiterated claim of exemption under Section 10(23BBA) stating that they were under no obligation to file returns of income - As far as the cash deposits are concerned, explanation given was that offerings in SBN had been made by devotees in hundis voluntarily during period of demonetization, and such collections, were not taxable - Several judgements have been relied upon in support of their claim for exemption - Whether grants and endowments to temples were properly utilized or diverted for welfare of private individuals – Held, Board was vested with power to control and supervise administration of temple - Similarly, power to appoint officials to temples for proper administration was also vested with the Board - Subsequently to streamline administration of Board, a special officer was appointed in year 1940 - It was suggested in 1942 by non-official committee under chairmanship of a retired High Court Judge that it will be proper if Government undertakes administration directly instead of Board - It was accepted and Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1951 was promulgated - Several amendments were brought out and the Government took over administration of temples and after several detailed amendments were carried out, Act XXII of 1959 - Based on this Act, a separate Government Department was created for Administration of temples - It is open to income–tax authorities to proceed accordingly qua constituents, in accordance with law. W.P. is dismissed.

ORDER :

1. These writ petitions have been filed by the Sri Vaithiyanathaswamy and Sri Amirthakadeswaraswamy Devasthanams and raise important issues on the interpretation of Section 10(23BBA) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (IT Act).

2. The impugned notice and order in W.P.No.29315 of 2019 have been issued to Sri Vaithiyanathaswamy Devasthanam, also known as the Velur Devasthanam, comprising the Vaitheeswaran Koil at Sirkazhi Taluk, Thanjavur, Sri Veeratteswara Swami Temple, Korkkai, Mayiladuthurai Taluk, Sri Kutramporutheeswarar Temple, Thalaignayiru, Mayiladuthurai Taluk, Sri Lakshmipureeswarar Temple, Thirunandriyur, Mayiladuthurai Taluk, Sri Maruthapureeswarar Temple, Maruvatthur, Sirkazhi Taluk, Sri Mariyamman Temple, Sri Angalaparameswari Temple, Sri Ayyanar Temple, Sri Pidariyamman Temple, Sri Thirowbathaiyamman Temple, Vaitheeswaran koil, Sirkazhi Taluk, Sri Ayyanar Temple, Neikuppai, Sirkazhi Taluk, (‘constituent temples’) shrines in the aforesaid temple premises and endowments and charities. As for the petitioner in W.P.29312 of 2019, the Amirthakadeswaraswamy Devasthanam comprises the Sri Amirthakadeswara Swami Temple, Thirukkadaiyur, Tranqubar Taluk, Sri Veeratteswara Swami Temple, Parasaloor, Tranqubar Taluk, Sri Thuraikattum Vallalar Swami Temple, Vilanagar, Tranqubar Taluk, Sri Mariyamman Temple, Ottangadu Temple, Tranqubar Taluk, Sri Agneeswara Swami Temple, Udayavar Koil Pathu, (Panjakkai), Tranqubar Taluk, Sri Edirkaleswarar Temple, Thirukkadaiyur, Tranqubar Taluk and Sri Kathayamman Temple, Thirukkadaiyur, Tranqubar Taluk (‘constituent temples’) along with shrines for other deities and endowments. Both Devasthanams come under the supervision and management of the Dharmapuram Adheenam and are jointly referred to as ‘devasthanams’ and singly as ‘devasthanam’ for convenience and clarity. All the constituent temples are listed in terms of Section 45(3) of the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act 1959 (HR&CE Act).

3. The Dharmapuram Adheenam (‘Adheenam’) is a Saivite Mutt, based in Mayiladuthurai that oversees the administration and management of 27 temples dedicated to the worship of Lord Shiva and His consorts. The temples are grouped into smaller devasthanams under the overall management of the Adheenam, each devasthanam administering major and minor temples shrines, charities and endowments.

4. The devasthanams claim that they are regularly audited by the HR&CE Department and the collections from Hundis and donations, and income from endowments and other properties are properly accounted for, deposited in their bank accounts and utilised towards their objects.

5. While so, the devasthanams had made cash deposits of amounts of Rs.11,40,800/- and Rs.38,84,660/- (Sri Vaithiyanathaswamy Devasthanam) and Rs.60,21,054/- (Sri Amirthakadeswara Swami Devasthanam) for assessment year (AY) 2017-18 which came to the attention of the Income Tax Department. No returns of income in terms of the provisions of the IT Act had been filed by the devasthanams and notices under Section 142(1) thus came to be issued calling upon the devasthanams to file returns of income. The notices were followed up with reminders to which also, there was no compliance by the devasthanams. Thus, a communication dated 09.03.2018 came to be issued by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax bringing to the notice of the devasthanams the extension of due date for filing of a ROI for AY 2017-18, upto 31.03.2018. He urged that the opportunity be utilised and returns of income filed within the extended period. In response, the devasthanams, setting out the history of their constitution, explained that the deposits comprise voluntary donations made in specified bank notes (SBN) in their hundis. They claimed an exemption in terms of Section 10(23BBA) of the IT Act and prayed that the proposed proceedings for assessment be dropped. The petitioners also requested the refund of any amounts deducted as tax at source.

6. Communication dated 05.08.2019

            Click Here to Read the rest of this document
            1
            2
            3
            4
            5
            6
            7
            8
            9
            10
            11
            SupremeToday Portrait Ad
            supreme today icon
            logo-black

            An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

            Please visit our Training & Support
            Center or Contact Us for assistance

            qr

            Scan Me!

            India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

            For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

            whatsapp-icon Back to top