SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 3354

R.SUBRAMANIAN
Reliance General Insurance Co. Limited. , Reliance – Appellant
Versus
P. Poongavanam – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Arunkumar
For the Respondent: M/s. Ramya V. Rao

JUDGMENT :

Since the Insurance Company is not disputing the liability, notice to the fourth respondent is deemed unnecessary.

2. The Insurance company is on appeal questioning the award of a sum of Rs.20,00,000/- as compensation for the death of one Valliappan in a Motor Accident. Claimants, who are the parents and sister of the deceased lodged a claim seeking compensation of Rs.50,00,000/- contending that Valliappan died due to the accident when the Tipper Lorry bearing TN 22- BS-0569 was driven in the reverse direction by its driver in a rash and negligent manner. Claiming that the petitioners have lost both financial and moral support because of the death, they sought for compensation.

3. This is resisted by the Insurance Company contending that the accident did not happen in the manner suggested by the claimants. The Insurance Company also objected to the quantum of compensation claimed and denied the existence of insurance.

4. Before the Tribunal, the first claimant was examined as PW-2. Exs. P-1 to P-7 were marked. The respondent Insurance Company did not let in either oral or documentary evidence. The Tribunal on a consideration of the evidence on record concluded that it was th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top