SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 471

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, J.
Chinna Anandhan (died) - Petitioners
Versus
Anandan – Respondents
C.R.P(NPD)Nos.4498 & 4499 of 2015
Decided On : 19-01-2022

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr.R.Marudhachalamurthy
For the Respondents: No Appearance

Dismissal of applications based on technicalities was not justified, and the court directed the trial court to consider the necessary documents and pass appropriate orders.

Headnote:

Legal Heirs - Recognition and Impleadment - Order XXII Rule 3, Section 151 of C.P.C - I.A.No.137 of 2014, I.A.No.138 of 2014 - Summary of Acts and Sections: Order XXII Rule 3, Section 151 of C.P.C - The court remanded the matter back to the trial court for fresh consideration after the necessary documents were produced to establish the petitioners as the legal representatives of the deceased plaintiff. The trial court was directed to consider the documents and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with the law.

Fact of the Case:

The plaintiff filed a suit for partition and injunction, but died intestate during the proceedings. The widow and children filed applications to be recognized as legal heirs and added as parties to the suit. The applications were dismissed by the trial court due to technicalities.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the dismissal of the applications by the trial court was based on technicalities and remanded the matter back for fresh consideration after the necessary documents were produced.

Issues: Recognition of legal heirs, dismissal of applications based on technicalities, production of necessary documents.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the dismissal of the applications based on technicalities was not justified, and directed the trial court to consider the necessary documents and pass appropriate orders.

Final Decision: The fair and decreetal order passed by the trial court was set aside, and the matter was remanded back to the trial court for fresh consideration. The Civil Revision Petitions were allowed, and the trial court was directed to dispose of the suit expeditiously.

ORDER :

These Civil Revision Petitions have been filed by the petitioners challenging the fair and decreetal order passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Sankari in I.A.No.137 of 2014 in I.A.No.268 of 2013 in O.S.No.75 of 2013 and I.A.No.138 of 2014 in O.S.No.75 of 2013 dated 28.11.2014 respectively, dismissing the two Interlocutory Applications viz., I.A.Nos.137 & 138 of 2014 filed by the petitioners, under Order XXII Rule 3 and Section 151 of C.P.C, to recognize them as the legal heirs of the deceased plaintiff (Chinna Anandhan) and order to add and implead them as parties to the suit O.S.No.75 of 2013.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. None appeared on behalf of the respondents.

3. The brief facts of the case are as follows: The plaintiff (deceased Chinna Anandhan) has filed the suit O.S.No.75 of 2013 before the Sub Court, Sankari for the following reliefs:

    (i) directing the respondents/defendants to divide the suit property into 18 equal shares considering the soil nature and providing all amenities and allot 10 such shares to the plaintiff and put him in separate possession of such allotted share failing which pass a preliminary decree for partition making provision for passing final decree by way of commissioner.

(ii) permanent injunction restraining the respondents 1 & 3/defendants 1 & 3, their men, agents, servants etc., from in any way and in any manner making any kind of alienation or encumbrance in the suit properties till the passing of final decree in the suit.

3.1. Subsequent to the filing of the suit O.S.No.75 of 2013, the plaintiff (Chinna Anandhan) died intestate on 19.05.2013 leaving behind his wife Pavayee, three minor sons viz., (i) Anandharaj (ii) Gunasekaran & (iii) Naveen Kumar and mother Kuppayee. After the death of her husband, the said Pavayee/first petitioner has filed the Interlocutory Applications in I.A.Nos.137 & 138 of 2014 before the Sub Court, Sankari, praying to recognize herself, her three minor sons/petitioners 2 to 4 and her mother in law/fifth petitioner as the legal heirs of the deceased plaintiff (Chinna Anandhan) and order to add and implead them as parties to the suit O.S.No.75 of 2013 filed by her husband/deceased plaintiff. The petitioners herein were proposed parties 2 to 6 in the suit.

3.2. The learned Subordinate Judge, Sankari vide fair and decreetal order dated 28.11.2014 has dismissed the Interlocutory Applications filed by the petitioners, for the following reasons:

    (i) the first petitioner/wife of the plaintiff has filed the affidavit alone in I.A.Nos.137 & 138 of 2014 and she has not filed the relevant petition to represent her minor sons/proposed parties 3 to 5/respondents 2 to 4 as mother/guardian.

(ii) the petitioners have not filed the Death Certificate showing the date of death of the deceased plaintiff (Chinna Anandhan) as well as the Legal Heirship Certificate of the deceased plaintiff namely Chinna Anandhan, issued by the Tahsildhar in their favour. Aggrieved over the dismissal of I.A.Nos.137 & 138 of 2014, the petitioners have filed the present Civil Revision Petition before this Court.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that both the Interlocutory Applications filed by the petitioners in I.A.Nos.137 & 138 of 2014 were dismissed by the trial Court, on the ground that the first petitioner has filed only the affidavit in those Applications and she has not filed the necessary petition and also, the petitioners have not produced the documents such as Death Certificate of the deceased plaintiff and Legal Heirship Certificate of the deceased plaintiff, issued in their favour.

4.1. He further submitted that he has filed the Additional Typed Set of Papers dated 08.11.2021 before this Court, in which, he has enclosed the following documents:

    (i) Death Certificate of Arumugam (plaintiff's father/fifth petitioner's husband) dated 22.03.2013

(ii) Death Certificate of the Chinna Anandhan (plaintiff) dated 30.05.2013

(iii) Legal Heirship Certificate of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top