P.T.ASHA
M. Venkatachalam – Appellant
Versus
Karunkarapandian – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The 1st defendant in the suit O.S.No.119 of 2010 is the revision petitioner before this Court. He has challenged the dismissal of an application filed by him invoking the provisions of Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure to reject the plaint in O.S.No.119 of 2010.
2. In order to appreciate the grievance of the petitioner herein, it is necessary to set out the following dates and events:-
“CHRONOLOGY OF DATES AND EVENTS
S.No. DATE EVENTS
1 18.12.1982
The paternal grandfather of the revision petitioner and the 2nd respondent, one Ramasamy Naidu executes a settlement deed in their favour retaining a life interest for himself.
2 21.08.1995
Ramasamy Naidu unilaterally cancels the settlement deed
stating that the petitioner and the 2nd respondent have not complied with the terms of settlement.
3 05.09.1995
The revision petitioner herein and the 2nd respondent, who were minors then, had instituted the suit O.S.No.652 of 1995 on the file of the Sub Court, Dindigul, which was later transferred to the District Munsif Court, Palani and numbered as O.S.No.222 of 1996 and once again transferred to the Sub Court, Palani and numbered as O.S.No.160 of 1998 to declare the cancellati
N.Palanisamy Vs. A.Palaniswamy reported in AIR 1998 Mad 264.
The Member Concern Department of Post Vs. Annapoorni and others reported in 2005 4 LW 206.
Nesammal and another Vs. Edward and another reported in 1998 2 CTC 537.
Samarendra Nath Sinha and another Vs. Krishna Kumar Nag reported in 1966 0 Supreme (SC) 306.
K.K.Modi Vs. K.N.Modi and others reported in (1998) 3 SCC 573
Seeni Alias Sundarammal Vs. Ramasamy Poosari and 2 others reported in (2000) III CTC 74
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.