JUDGMENT :

This Second Appeal is filed challenging the judgment and decree of the learned I Additional District Judge, Cuddalore, in A.S.No.31 of 2017 reversing the judgment and decree of the learned Subordinate Judge, Panruti in O.S.No.91 of 2013.

2. Respondent/plaintiff filed the suit against Gnanasekara pandian for the relief of direction to vacate him from the suit property and surrender possession with the super structure therein and for costs.

3. The case of the respondent is that a suit property with super structure and oil mill machineries therein absolutely belongs to respondent. It was leased to Gnanasekara pandian. The lease agreement was executed on 01.06.2006 for three years. The lease agreement is an unregistered lease agreement. Gnanasekara pandian agreed to pay monthly rent at Rs.8,750/-. The lease period is for three years. Even after the completion of lease period Gnanasekara pandian has not vacated and he continued to pay monthly rent at Rs.8,750/-. Without the prior permission of the respondent and contrary to the conditions of lease agreement he installed additional machineries and altered super structure. After the expiry of the lease period, respondent repeatedl