SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 3387

V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN
J. Angel Mary – Appellant
Versus
Thanislas – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. C.T.Perumal

JUDGMENT :

The present second appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree dated 08.09.2012 passed in A.S.No.75 of 2015 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Padmanabhapuram, Kanyakumari District, confirming the judgment and decree dated 15.07.2015 passed in O.S. No.293 of 2013 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Padmanapuram.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to herein, as per their own ranking, as before the Trial Court.

3. The case of the plaintiff, as per the averments made in the plaint, in short, is as follows:

    (i) The plaint 'A' schedule property is having an extent of 1312 cents comprised in Resurvey No.285/21 of Valvachagostam village belongs to her husband and the property belongs to the first defendant who sold the same to one Regin Merit through a sale deed No.1667/2004 of Palliyadi Sub Registrar office including the plaint 'B' Schedule property. Subsequently the husband of the plaintiff purchased the plaint 'A' schedule property and 'B' schedule property through a sale deed No. 4251/2011 and was in possession and enjoyment of the same. 'B' schedule property is the pathway for the 'A' schedule property. The husband of the plaintiff

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top