SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 438

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
V.BHARATHIDASAN, J.
M.Gopalakrishnan (Died) Rep. By his LR Mrs.Shakila Ramesh – Appellant
Versus
State by Deputy Superintendent of Police – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No.223 of 2009
Decided on : 04-02-2022

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.Sunder Mohan
For the Respondent: Mr.K.Srinivasan, Spl. Public Prosecutor for

Headnote:

Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Section 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) - Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Section 5(2) r/w 5(1)(d) - Indian Penal Code,1860 - Section 120-B r/w 420 - Appeal Against Convicting - Challenging conviction and sentence imposed as set out above A1 filed this appeal - Pending appeal A1 died and at instance of his wife by order leave was granted to continue appeal - Where a sentence of fine is imposed under sub-section (2) of section 13 or section 14, the court is fixing the amount of the fine shall take into consideration the amount or the value of the property, if any, which the accused person has obtained by committing the offence or where the conviction is for an offence referred to in clause (e) of sub-section (1) of section 13, the pecuniary resources or property referred to in that clause for which the accused person is unable to account satisfactorily, Para 19,20

Finding of the Court:

There is no finding given by trial court that A1 had obtained pecuniary advantage or obtained any valuable property while committing offence - In those this court is of considered view that imposing amount as fine on A1 is highly excessive and imposing such huge amount as fine does not warrant in view of undisputed facts of this case - While imposing fine trial court should have taken into consideration nature of charges and undisputed offence and circumstances in which offences were committed and the pecuniary advantage obtained by accused person - Therefore considering this court is of the view that fine imposed by trial court is required to be modified - This court has been informed that pursuant to orders passed by this court on petition filed by deceased appellant seeking suspension of sentence deceased appellant paid a sum of amount as part of a total fine imposed on him.

Result: Criminal Appeal is allowed.

JUDGMENT :

This appeal is against the judgment dated 27.04.2009 in C.C.No.66 of 2000 on the file of the learned XI Additional Judge, Special Court for CBI Cases, Chennai, convicting and sentencing A-1 (since deceased) to undergo rigorous imprisonment and to pay fine under various charges, the details of which will be narrated at the appropriate place in this Judgment.

2. There were totally 6 accused in the case and the deceased appellant was arrayed as A1. A1 to A6 stood charged for various offences as detailed below:-

Sl.No.

Accused

Stood Charged under

1

A1 to A6

Section 120-B r/w 420 of IPC, Section 5(2) r/w 5(1)(d) of The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 and Section 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988

2

A2

Section 5(2) r/w 5(1)(d) of The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947

3

A1

Section 420 of IPC

4

A1

Section 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988

5

A2

Section 420 of IPC

6

A2

Section 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988

7

A1 and A2

Section 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988

8

A1 and A2

Section 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988

9

A3 to A6

Section 420 of IPC

10

A3 to A6

Section 420 of IPC

11

A1 and A2

Section 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988

12

A3 to A6

Section 420 of IPC

13

A1 and A2

Section 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988

14

A3 to A6

Section 420 of IPC

15

A1 and A2

Section 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988

16

A5

Section 420 of IPC

17

A1 and A2

Section 420 of IPC

18

A1 and A2

Section 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988

19

A3 to A6

Section 420 of IPC

20

A1 and A2

Section 109 r/w 420 of IPC

Pending trial, A3 died and therefore, charges against him stood and the trial court, after full-fledged trial convicted A1 and A2 on certain charges framed against each of them and acquitted them from the other charges while A4 to A6 were acquitted from all the charges and sentenced A1 and A2 accordingly as detailed under:-

Charge No.

Rank of the Accused

Penal provisions under which Accused was/were Convicted/Charges from which Accused was/were Acquitted

Quantum of Sentence Imposed by the trial court on A1 and A2/Finding against A3 to A6

1

A1

Section 120-B r/w 420 of IPC, Section 5(2) r/w 5(1)(d) of The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 and Section 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988

RI for 7 years and to pay a fine of Rs.10,00,000/- in default to undergo RI for 1

Years

 

 

A2

Section 120-B r/w 420 of IPC, Section 5(2) r/w 5(1)(d) of The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 and Section 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988

RI for 7 years and to pay a fine of Rs.10,00,000/- in default to undergo RI for 1 Years

 

A3

Section 120-B r/w 420 of IPC, Section 5(2) r/w 5(1)(d) of The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 and Section 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988

Charges Abated

 

 

A4 to A6

Section 120-B r/w 420 of IPC, Section 5(2) r/w 5(1)(d) of The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 and Section 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988

Acquitted

 

2

A2

Section5(2) r/w 5(1)(d) of The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947

RI for 7 years and to pay a fine of Rs.10,00,000/- in default to undergo RI for 1 years

3

A1

Section 420 of IPC

RI for 7 years and to pay a fine of Rs.10,00,000/- in default to undergo RI for 1 years

4

A1

Section 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top