SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 3537

V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN
Palani Murugan – Appellant
Versus
Rengarajan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.G.Gomathi Sankar
For the Respondents: Mr.G.Karnan

JUDGMENT :

The appeal is directed against the Judgment and Decree passed in A.S.No.34 of 2014, by the learned Principal Subordinate Court, Srivilliputhur, confirming the Judgment and Decree in O.S.No.185 of 2010, passed by the learned Additional District Munsif Court, Srivilliputhur.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to herein, as per their own ranking, as before the Trial Court.

3. The case of the plaintiff, as per the averments made in the plaint, in short, is as follows :

Originally the suit property belongs to the father of the defendants namely, Srinivasa Iyyangar and he intended to sell the suit property to the plaintiff's father namely, Muthaiah Thevar, for which, a sale agreement, dated 09.08.1979 was executed, wherein, sale consideration was fixed at Rs.21,480/- (Rupees Twenty One Thousand Four Hundred and Eighty only and paid a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) as advance and balance of Rs.8,480/- (Rupees Eight Thousand Four Hundred and Eighty only) have to be paid to the Srinivasa Iyyangar and six months time was fixed for executing the sale deed and the possession of the suit property was handed over to the plaintiff's father. Since th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top