K.MURALI SHANKAR
Ganapathiraman @ Ganesan – Appellant
Versus
Suganthi – Respondent
ORDER :
The Criminal Revision Case is directed against the order passed in M.C.No.30 of 2016, dated 26.09.2017 on the file of the Family Court, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar District.
2. The respondent by invoking Section 125 of Cr.P.C, has filed the case in M.C.No.3 of 2016 before the Family Court, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar District, claiming maintenance at Rs.50,000/- per month. The revision petitioner has filed counter statement, disputing the marriage alleged by the respondent and the liability to pay the maintenance. The learned Judge, Family Court, upon considering the evidence and on hearing the arguments of both sides, has passed the impugned order on 26.09.2017, directing the revision petitioner to pay monthly maintenance of Rs.20,000/- from the date of petition. Aggrieved by the said order, the husband has come forward with the present revision.
3. Whether the impugned order passed in M.C.No.30 of 2016, dated 26.09.2017 on the file of the Family Court, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar District is liable to be set aside ? is the point of consideration.
4. The case of the respondent/wife is that the marriage between herself and the petitioner was solemnized on 23.05.2010 at Sanka
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.