Balamurugan vs State through the Inspector of Police, Nachiyarkovil Police Station

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2021 Supreme(Mad) 3509

V.BHARATHIDASAN, J.NISHA BANU
Balamurugan – Appellant
Versus
State through the Inspector of Police, Nachiyarkovil Police Station – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. N. Ananthapadmanaban.
For the Respondent: Mr. A. Thiruvadikumar.

JUDGMENT :

V. BHARATHIDASAN, J.

1. The appellants are the accused Nos. 1 and 2 in S.C. No. 158 of 2014, on the file of the Additional District Sessions Court (Fast Track Court), Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District and they stood charged and tried for the offence under Section 302 of I.P.C.

2. The trial Court, vide impugned judgment dated 17.07.2018, has convicted the appellants herein for the above said offence and imposed the sentences, thus:

Accused	Conviction	Sentence
First Accused	U/s. 302 of I.P.C.	To undergo life imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs. 5,000/- in default to undergo six months rigorous imprisonment.
Second Accused	U/s. 302 of I.P.C.	To undergo life imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs. 5,000/- in default to undergo six months rigorous imprisonment.

3. The case of the prosecution in brief as follows:

The deceased one Pugalendhi is the son of PWs. 1 and 2, A2 is the brother of PW-1 and A1 is the son of A2. There was a civil dispute between them regarding a landed property. There were frequent quarrels between the families. On 02.06.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2021 Supreme(Mad) 3509

V.BHARATHIDASAN, J.NISHA BANUBalamurugan – AppellantVersusState through the Inspector of Police, Nachiyarkovil Police Station – Respondent

V.BHARATHIDASAN, J.NISHA BANU
Balamurugan – Appellant
Versus
State through the Inspector of Police, Nachiyarkovil Police Station – Respondent