P.T.ASHA
K. Kanimozhi – Appellant
Versus
Kandasamy (Died) – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
P.T. ASHA, J.
1. The appellant whose petition filed under the provisions of Order XXI Rules 97 and 99 of the Code of Civil Procedure had been dismissed by the learned Additional District Judge, Dharmapuri, without even registering the said petition is before this Court challenging the said order.
2. The facts in brief which are necessary for disposing of this appeal are as follows:
3. In the said suit, the 2nd respondent herein had filed a Written Statement, which has been adopted by the said Kandasamy and the 3rd respondent herein, in which they had referred to a suit O.S. No. 89 of 2014 filed by the appellant herein before the learned Subordinate Judge, Arur seeking partition of the properties, which are the subject matter of the instant suit in O.S. No. 550 of 2012.
4. The learned Additional District Judge, Dharmapuri after trial had proceeded to decree the suit as prayed for by her Judgment and Decree dated 20.08.2015. Pursuant to th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.