SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Mad) 3545

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA
K. Raju – Appellant
Versus
Kuthalingam – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr.M.Thirunavukkarasu
For the Respondents: Mr.D.Nallathambi

ORDER :

This Civil Revision Petition has been filed by the petitioner/3rd party against the order of the trial Court in dismissing the petition filed by him under Order 1 Rule 10(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure to implead himself as one of the defendants in O.S. No.428 of 2010.

2. The suit in O.S.No.428 of 2010 has been filed by the respondents/plaintiffs against R1 and R2 who are respectively his brother and sister-in-law seeking for partition in the suit scheduled properties and to give half share. The suit for partition was filed on 20.12.2010. During the pendency of the suit, property was sold on 23.10.2013. The second respondent/first defendant and the legal heirs have sold the suit scheduled first property to the revision petitioner by registered sale deed dated 21.10.2013. The revision petitioner who is the purchaser pendente lite had filed the petition under Order 1 Rule 10(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking to implead him as necessary party in the suit. The application had been filed on 06.01.2014, when the case was listed for trial, the respondents/plaintiff had filed the objection in IA No. 47 of 2014 . The Trial Court holding that the petitioner being a purchaser

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top