SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Mad) 1596

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
A. Rama Murthi, J.
Titan Industries Ltd. - Appellants
Vs.
Kanishk Jewellery - Respondent
Orl. Appln. No. 78 of 2002 in C.S. No. 75 of 2002
Decided On : 18-11-2002

Likelihood of deception or confusion is crucial in passing-off actions, and establishing the same is essential to succeed in trademark infringement claims.

Headnote:

TANISHQ - Trademark Infringement - Companies Act, 1956 - [Companies Act, 1956] - The court discussed the plaintiff's claim of trademark infringement under the Companies Act, 1956, and the defendant's defense based on the phonetic, visual, and structural differences between the marks. The court emphasized the importance of establishing likelihood of deception or confusion to succeed in a passing-off action.

Fact of the Case:

The plaintiff, a well-known jewellery company, sought an interim injunction against the defendant's jewellery business using the name KANISHK, alleging trademark infringement and passing off of goods. The defendant denied the allegations, claiming an honest adoption of the name KANISHK based on familial and astrological factors.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case and balance of convenience in their favor. It emphasized the need to prove likelihood of deception or confusion in passing-off actions and dismissed the application.

Issues: The main issue was whether the plaintiff had a prima facie case and the balance of convenience in their favor to warrant an interim injunction against the defendant's use of the name KANISHK for their jewellery business.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need to establish likelihood of deception or confusion in passing-off actions, considering factors such as the nature of the marks, degree of resemblance, nature of goods, class of purchasers, and surrounding circumstances.

Final Decision: The court dismissed the plaintiff's application for interim injunction, finding that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case and balance of convenience in their favor.

JUDGMENT :

A. Rama Murthi, J.

1. The applicant/plaintiff filed this application to grant interim injunction restraining the respondent/defendant firm and their men from directly or indirectly in any manner from making use of the name KANISHK for its goods and/or, as its corporate name of trading style or any other name which is deceptively, phonetically and confusingly similar to the plaintiffs' name TANISHQ and also from passing off its name and goods under the name KANISHK as that of the plaintiffs pending disposal of the suit.

2. The case in brief is as follows:- The plaintiff is a company registered under Companies Act, 1956. The plaintiff company is a well known company having its manufacturing unit and registered office at Hosur as well as its branch office and service centres all over the country with its Corporate Office situated in Bangalore. The plaintiff company was incorporated in 1984 as a joint venture of the world famous TATA Industries with Tamil Nadu Industrial Development Corporation. They started their main business of manufacturing and sale of watches and timepieces immediately thereafter. The company was originally incorporated under the name of TITAN WATCHES LIMITED and subsequently changed its name to TITAN INDUSTRIES LIMITED with a view to give better expression to its diversification activities in several fields of trade and commerce including manufacturing activities, for different types of goods and products such as jewellery, etc. Several companies have been promoted by the plaintiff as associate companies. In pursuance of the diversification activities, the plaintiff in the year 1993 ventured into the field manufacture and sale of exquisite quality and trendy jewellery items so as to cater to the needs and requirements of all categories of the buying public, not only of the aristocrats but of the common man in affordable range of prices. They have invested a sum of Rs. 60 crores in terms of equipment and infrastructure and started a jewellery manufacturing unit located at Hosur in Tamil Nadu over a 1,35,000 sq. ft. of built up area. They have invented/coined and adopted an innovative name TANISHQ to be used as a trade name/trade mark for its jewellery items in 1994. This mark required a great deal of imagination and a high decree of inventions to coin and the resulting trade mark is unique and is inherently distinctive and cannot be hit upon by another person. The first exclusive TANISHQ jewelry boutique was inaugurated in Chennai in July 1996. They have also opened several TANISHQ boutiques in many cities of India and abroad. It has become a household name all over India including Chennai for design; quality and reliability in jewellery items. The range includes rings, ear rings, bracelets, bangles, necklaces, pendants available at reasonable prices. Over the years the plaintiff has also added diamond an diamond studded jewellery to its TANISHQ range of products. The plaintiff has also applied for registration of TANISHQ with Registrar of Trade Marks in October 1994, The company had also independently applied to the Registrar of Trade Marks for registration of the name/mark TANISHQ in all 34 classes of goods stated in IV schedule of Trade and Merchandise Marks Rules. All the applications are now pending for registration. The said trade mark is registered in favour of the plaintiff in Argentina, Bahamas, Benelux, Bermuda, Cambodia, Hong Kong and several other countries. They have also spent considerable amount towards advertisement/sales & promotion expenditure, etc. The name TANISHQ has left an indelible impression on the public at large that the goods sold under this trademark is a quality product of the plaintiff having the goodwill and backup of the famous TATA Industries. The particulars of the sales turn over are also given. They have been organising several exhibitions, fashion shows, cultural activities and held several seminars all over the country and it was widely reported in newspapers and

        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        8
        9
        10
        11
        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
        supreme today icon
        logo-black

        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

        Please visit our Training & Support
        Center or Contact Us for assistance

        qr

        Scan Me!

        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

        whatsapp-icon Back to top