SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 542

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Abdul Quddhose, J.
P.K. Shefi - Appellant
Versus
The Director/CS, The Indian Railway Catering and Tourism Corporation Ltd., New Delhi & Others - Respondent
W.P. No. 24291 of 2021 & WMP No. 25609 of 2021
Decided On : 29-06-2022

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :ARL. Sundaresan, Senior Counsel, AL. Gandhimathi, Advocate.
For the Respondents:V.J. Suresh Kumar, Advocate.

Point of Law: Scope of judicial review when examining policy of Government is to check whether it violates fundamental rights of citizens or it is opposed to provisions of Constitution or opposed to any statutory provisions or manifestly arbitrary. Courts cannot interfere with a policy decision either on ground that it is erroneous or on ground that a better, fairer or vicer alternative is available.

Headnote:

Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226 and 14 - Train services - Extension for static units - Reopen the entry/exit gate – Covid0-19 Guidelines - Licence fees – Petitioner made several representations to second respondent requesting second respondent to appraise the Railway authorities to clear blockade and reopen entry/exit gate near Food Plaza. Therefore, according to petitioner, he was unable to restart Food Plaza on mandatory date and commenced operations only from 25.08.2021. The respondents have fixed a reduced rate of licence fee during period - Being a policy decision, unless and until said policy decision is found to be rossly arbitrary or irrational, this Court cannot exercise its judicial review by interfering with a policy decision i.e., Circular and consequential proceedings. Courts cannot usurp the jurisdiction of decision makers in garb of judicial review. (Para 23)

Finding of the court: Admittedly, petitioner was also operating Cell Kitchen and Food Plaza paying reduced licence fees for which period, the free days based on a formula has been calculated by the Proceedings of the third respondent - The petitioner having run the Cell Kitchen and Food Plaza from contending that free days cannot be calculated when the passenger traffic and movement of trains was reduced due to Covid-19 pandemic and when the petitioner was paying the reduced licence charges. As observed earlier the petitioner having chosen not to exit from the contract despite the respondents giving such an option is now prohibited from contending that calculation of free days during the period when the petitioner was paying the reduced licence charges on account of Covid-19 Pandemic is arbitrary and illegal.

Result: Writ petition is dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for issuance of writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the proceedings bearing No.2017/RCTC/DCS/PROD/Take Over/02, dated 04.10.2021 of the 1st respondent herein and the consequential proceedings bearing No.IRCTC/SZ/CK-CGL/2019, dated 28.10.2021 and the proceedings bearing No.2019/IRCTC/SZ/FP-TPJ dated 29.10.2021 of the 3rd respondent herein quash the same and consequently direct the respondents herein to give extension for the static units operated by the petitioner from the date on which normalcy has returned and 100% regular train services as it stood before the lock down due to Covid 2019 are restored.

1. The contract period granted to the petitioner to run two canteens viz., Cell Kitchen at the Chengalpet Railway Station and the other at Food Plaza, Tiruchirapalli was extended by the Railways on account of Government imposed lock-down and the extended period was considered as free days i.e., the petitioner need not pay the license charges.

2. The non-operative period on account of Government imposed lock-down by the petitioner was treated as dies non period.

3. Insofar as the Cell Kitchen at Chengalpet Railway Station is concerned, the petitioner has been informed by the third respondent that he will be granted 246 days extension due to the non-operative period.

4. Insofar as the Food Plaza at Tiruchirapalli Junction is concerned, it is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner has operated it during the optional period and was not able to restart even after 15.07.2021, the date from which it was made mandatory to operate with reduced licence fees. According to the petitioner with regard to the Food Plaza at Tiruchirapalli Junction, the passenger movement was shifted far away from the original entrance in front of the Food Plaza, and the area around the Food Plaza was cordoned of and there was no passenger movement in the vicinity of the Food Plaza.

5. According to the petitioner, he made several representations to the second respondent requesting the second respondent to appraise the Railway authorities to clear the blockade and reopen the entry/exit gate near the Food Plaza. Therefore, according to the petitioner, he was unable to restart the Food Plaza at Tiruchirapalli on the mandatory date and commenced the operations only from 25.08.2021. The respondents have fixed a reduced rate of licence fee during the period from 01.06.2020 to 31.10.2021. The details are as follows :-

Period

Percentage

01.06.2020 to 30.09.2020

10%

01.10.2020 to 15.11.2020

20%

16.11.2020 to 30.11.2020

35%

01.12.2020 to 31.10.2021

20%

6. The licence fees for the above mentioned periods was reduced by the Railways on account of the fact that there was reduced passenger traffic on account of Covid-19 pandemic, though there was no complete lock-down imposed by the Government.

7. Guidelines were issued by the first respondent on 04.10.2021 for calculating the number of days for extension which the licensees are entitled to on account of the lock-down and restrictions due to the pandemic and that the said guidelines were issued in supersession of all the earlier directions.

8. The third respondent informed the petitioner by its letter dated 28.10.2021 that as per the guidelines, the petitioner having total of 246 days residual period (free days) as on 22.03.2020, including the dies non period has operated Cell Kitchen Unit at Chenglepet for 180 days with reduced license fee (till 31.10.2021), hence the remaining contract period for the Chengalpet Cell Kitchen, is 66 days, as per the tabular column, shown hereunder :

Sl. No.

Period of operations

No. of Days

Reduced License Fee %

Days accounted

1

01.06.2020

30.09.2020

122

10%

12

2

01.10.2020

15.1







        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        8
        9
        10
        11
        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
        supreme today icon
        logo-black

        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

        Please visit our Training & Support
        Center or Contact Us for assistance

        qr

        Scan Me!

        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

        whatsapp-icon Back to top