Shanmugasekar vs State Rep. by, The Inspector of Police, Ramanathapuram

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(Mad) 845

P.N.PRAKASH, R.HEMALATHA
Shanmugasekar – Appellant
Versus
State Rep. by, The Inspector of Police, Ramanathapuram – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appearing Parties :R. Manickaraj for M/S. Veera Associates, S. Kanagarajan, Advocate, A. Thiruvadi Kumar, Additional Public Prosecutor.

JUDGMENT :

P.N. Prakash , J.

(Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the judgment dated 12.07.2019, in S.C.No.105 of 2017, on the file of the I Additional District & Sessions Court, Paramakudi.

Appeal filed under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the judgment dated 12.07.2019, in S.C.No.105 of 2017, on the file of the I Additional District & Sessions Court, Paramakudi.)

1. These criminal appeal are filed against the judgment and order dated 12.07.2019, in S.C.No.105 of 2017, on the file of the Additional District & Sessions Court, Paramakudi.

2. Since these criminal appeals emanate from one and the same judgment of the Trial Court, they are considered and decided by this common judgment.

3. Initially, on 11.10.2017, the Trial Court framed certain charges against accused 1 to 6. But, subsequently, on 24.07.2018, the Trial Court altered the charges and framed as many as seven charges as detailed below:

Charge	Penal Provisions	Accused
1	147 I.P.C.	A3 to A6
2.	148 I.P.C.	A1 & A2
3.	294(b) I.P.C.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2022 Supreme(Mad) 845

P.N.PRAKASH, R.HEMALATHAShanmugasekar – AppellantVersusState Rep. by, The Inspector of Police, Ramanathapuram – Respondent

Cases Referred (1)

P.N.PRAKASH, R.HEMALATHA
Shanmugasekar – Appellant
Versus
State Rep. by, The Inspector of Police, Ramanathapuram – Respondent