J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD
Tamilnadu Fisheries Development Corporation, Rep. by its Managing Director – Appellant
Versus
Presiding Officer, Principal Labour Court, Madras – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of certiorari calling for the records of the order of the first respondent in I.D.No.671/92 dated 19.06.2001 and quash the same.)
1. The relief sought by the petitioner in this writ petition is to call for the records of the order passed by the first respondent in I.D.No.671 of 1992 dated 19.06.2001.
2. The case of the petitioner corporation is that on 07.09.1982, they appointed the second respondent as a daily wage cook on temporary basis to fry and market fish at Sathanoor Dam Establishment. Thereafter, the direct activity of the fried fish at Sathanoor Dam was not continued. So, the petitioner corporation terminated the second respondent from work on 15.09.1990, aggrieved over which, the second respondent had filed an Industrial Dispute in I.D.No.671 of 1992 before III Additional Labour Court, Madras. After the abolition of III Additional Labour Court, Madras, the said I.D.No.671 of 1992 was dealt with by the first respondent Court (Principal Labour Court, Madras). On 31.12.1992, the said I.D.No.671 of 1992 was dismissed for default. Subsequent to the dismissal of I
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.